Transcript of 104-10400-10316.pdf
==================================================
Page 1
==================================================
@aaa 60t184007031
2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992
SECRE [ SECuriTY
committers
11 March 1977
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr James M. Potts
Chief, Africa Division
gs4
Mr Richard S . Sampson
Chief, Europe Division
Mr _ Alan D_ Wolfe
Chief , Near East Division
Mr Richard F _ Stolz
Chief , Soviet/East European Division
FROM John D Walker
0/SA/DO/0
SUBJECT Guidelines for Providing Information
to the HouseAppropriations Committee
Surveys and Investigations Staff
Concerning Foreign Intelligence and
Security Services
1 Since members of the S& I Staff will be
talking with your Divisions in the near future
it may be worthwhile to review the guidelines as
to what may be said conce rning relationships with
foreign liaison services In the broad sense
liaison services constitute both a source and a
method .
2 _ We are prepared to discuss the following ?
a _ The identification and responsibili-
ties of the liaison services. in a particular
area to the extent that we can draw on
sources other than information derived through
the established liaison relationship , 1.e ,
overt information or information from penetra -
tions which will not endanger the source
b _ In further describing the liaison
services _
)
we can provide information on the
objectives , personnel , s trength, budget
E2 IMPDET
CL BY 012860
SECRET
for
Nazt
Ku
mrkt:
key
==================================================
Page 2
==================================================
13-00000
SEGEET
and methods of operations of services, provided
that such data will be drawn from open sources
or penetrations and not from details of liaison
arrangements with the services themselves
C Agency manhours and funds devoted to
liaison with the foreign services .
d In the case of SIGINT liaison further
details on such arrangements including the
scope of funds and equipment provided to such
foreign s ervices
d We are prepared to provide general
comments on the degree of operational coopera-
tion with the Station If technical s upport ,
for example _ provides a useful input we can
state that the liaison service
provides
technical support , using a qualifying adjective
to define such as excellent , limited , etc _
3 _ We have no objection to the provision 0 f
foreign intelligence reports based on liaison with
such services Source descriptions should be those
used in the disseminated report .
4. We will not make available details on
liaison arrangements information on sources and
methods of such services which have been obtained
through liaison or jointly controlled sources or
other information which would reveal Agency sources
and methods or violate the trust on which the
official liaison relationship is based .
5 _ The SGI Staff approves close liaison
relationships and believes that these relationships
are cost effective
John D Walker
0/SA/DO/0:JDWalker:kaw (1542)
Distribution
Original c/AF
1 C/EUR
L C/NE
C/SE 2
SA/ DO/0
SECHET
==================================================
Page 3
==================================================
13-00000
Guidlc ] incs for Prov jdl In formalt i on
t0 Congressiona 1 Overs i ght (ommittecs Om1
Foreign Intelligence and Sccurity Scrvices
These guidel ines take into account the fact that
foreign intelligence and security: services , when acting
in connection with the Agency' s 0f ficial liaison with
them , . constitute both a source and a method and thus
require the statutory protect ion accorded any other
intelligence source or method: The guidelines a 1s0
recognize that the duly constituted overs ight bodies 0f
the Congress have expressed an interest in such services
and in the genera l scope , nature and extent 0 f the Agency' s
relationships with them The purpose 0 f thesc guidelines
is to provide a foriula for dealing with thesc two
sometimes conElicting objectives .
The Agency is prepared to provide , upon specific
request, appropriately classified and sanitized information
to oversight committees 0n the following aspccts of
foreign intelligence andl security services :
a _ Thc idcntification 0fF the governmcnts Wvith
whose services CIA has liaison arrangements ;
b . Agency man hours and funds devotcd to
liaison with forcign scrvices;'
C In the casc 0 f S]GINT liaison further
details on such arrangemcnts including the scope of
S3Z57
ine
==================================================
Page 4
==================================================
13-00000
funds a ndl cquipment provided to such forcign scrviccs ;
d Jnforma t ion on thc objcctives , personnel
strength, budget and methods of operation 0f such s-ervices ,
erovided that such data Will be drawn from open sources or
penetrat ions and not from the details 0f liaison
arrangement s with the services themselves ;
Where relevant, foreign intelligence reports
based on iaison with such serviccs _
The Agency Will no t make available to the ovcrsight
comimittees the details 0 f liaison arrangements with
foreign services , information on sources and me thods 0 f
such services obtained through liaison or joint ly
controlled sources , or other information which would
reveal Agency sources or methods or violate thc trust 0n1
which these official liaison rclationships is necessarily
based .
In thc evcnt 0 f substantial allegations 0 f improper
activities conductcd by foreign intelligence 01 sccurity
services with wh ich the Agency is presumed to ma intain
liaison
)
every c [ fort will be madc to providlc a 11 relevant
facts which bc & r on such allegations Wherc this Iould
involve departurc froi the above guidel incs thc Dircctor
will be preparec to mcet with the Cha i rman or Vicc-Chairman
0 f the committcc to scek a satisfactory rcsolution 0 f such
problems _
ECES
key
==================================================
Page 5
==================================================
13-00000
MIFur
REvIEW STAFF
7s-20/4
24 July 1975,
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
Mr. Colby, Mitch Rogovin and Mr_ Knoche met with
Chairman Otis Pike at 9.30, 7/24 in Chairman Pike'8 office
to discuss groundrules, etc. for the House Select Committee
on Intelligence.
Mr . Colby left the following material with Pike:
1. 16 June 1975 Letter to the Honorable Elmer B= Staats
Comptroller General of the United States, Signed by
Mr. Colby. The letter deal8 with the GAO's audit
of the Central Intelligence Agency. (Attached)
2. Guide to Central Intelligence Agency Statutee and Law
dated September 1 970 (without the Ryan Amendment
on Foreign Intelligence). (Filed in 6D0120)
3_ Three Groudrules papers: (Attached)
~~Agreemente To Be SouhtBy the DCI With Chairmen
of the Select Committees
5
-Secrecy Agreement
~Guide8 for Protection f Claggified Information
And Documents Furnibhed The Select Committee
4. 11 March 1975 Letter from Colby to Senator Church:
(Attached)
Rogemarie R.Hegterberg
HSC
cUr 1 n
Se
==================================================
Page 6
==================================================
13-00000
SECRET
Checkliet DCI Discusgion with HSC
a Your intent to be cooperative and forthcoming.
2. Your responsibility to protect s&M: Will need HSC understanding
of particularly sengitive mattere:
-~pames of agents and gources-.
~~names of cooperating American organizations and
contacts to whom we have pledged confidentiality.
~~material from foreign liaison.
~beneitive intelligence methods and techniques of collection.
3 Will need to work out seeurity groundrules.
#~Chairman of USIB Security Committee and CIA Director
of Security available to help work out custodial arrangements ,
compartmented clearances, etc.
4 Importance of gecrecy agreements . Your willingness to suspend
them to permit testimony by current and ex-employees_
5. Will confirm with a letter and an employee bulletin which
can be used by HSC in dealing with Agency witnesses and
interviewe.
24 July 1975
Claestlled by
04359
Exompt Irom genorai
daclazlficalion schadulo 0 E.O: 11052
exemption schedulo 50 (1), (2), (J)
Autmatlcaly deelasblllcd on
SECRET Data Impossiblo to Dotormino
fOr
==================================================
Page 7
==================================================
13-00000
AGREEMENTS TO BE SOUGHT BY THE DCI WITH
CHAIRMEN OF THE SELECT COMMITTEES
It would be desirable if the DCI could secure agreement
with the Chairmen of the Select Committces; 28 has been customary
in other Congressional proceedings regarding sensitive matters, fbat:
(a) Departments' and agencies shall have the right
to request that testimony be givenlonly in executive session,
that in some instances testimony be "off-the-record" and
that certain testimony be heard only by memberg and in
bome cases,only by the Chairman and Vice Chairman
(6) Witpesses be afforded an opportunity to review
and.comment on and/or correct the record of their testimony_
prior to publication.of it:
(c) When que stioned about intelligence matters that
come under the purview of another organization, witnesses
should be permitted t state that a response to the question
is not properly within their authority and .to respectfully
Suggest that the appropriate party be called to testify on
such matters.
2; It would also be desirable if the DCI could secure agreement
with the Chairmen of the Select Committees that those agencies
furnishing documerts 'to the committees be authorized to excise from
those documents, prior to presentation, the names of their personnel
under cover or whose personal safety might be jeopardized as well as
those of other individuals whoge safety Or individual privacy. may be
jeopardized by disclosure- AIso excised should be names of sources,
operations: specific details of technical devices and systems main-
tained in compartmented channels and names of organizations
cooperating on & highly confidential basis.
3 In view of their susceptibility to foreign countermeasures,
it would be desirable if the DCI could obtain agreement with the
Chairmen of the Select Committees not to require presentation of details
any
==================================================
Page 8
==================================================
13-00000
0f thc technology of the technical collection programs- It would 2lso
be desirable if the Select Committces adopted the usc of Compart-
mentcd Control-Systens to protect documents on these programs
2nd cleared only those staff personnel with an absolute need-to-knor-
The responsible departments and agencies would be glad to advise
an assist in arrangements the Chairmen would desire in this
compartrented
area;
4. Furtber;' it-would be desirable if the:DCI atterpt to
secure &n agreement with the Chairmen %f the Select: Committees
that will entertain and consider security principles and guide
lines which will be provided:
any
they
==================================================
Page 9
==================================================
13-00000
SECRECY AGREEMENT
in accepting employment_
Or
assignment with the Select Committee to Study Governmental
Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, recognize the
special trust and confidence placed in me to protect classified infor -
mation from unauthorized disclosure.
I hereby agree to accept the specific obligations set forth
below as 2 condition precedent of my employment or assignment with
the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect
to Intelligence Activities, established by the Senate of the United
States, Resolution 21, agreed to on January 27, 1975, hereinafter
referred to as the Select Committee_
It is my understanding that in the course of my employment
or assignment with .the Select Comrittee I will be given access to
information from departments and agencies of the Government which
is clas sified in accordance.with the standards set forth in Executive
Order: 11652 of March 8, 1972, a9 amended. AlL classified information
50
acquired me in the course 0f my employment remains the
property of the United States of America ana I further agree to
burrender upon demand by the Chairman of the Select Committee
or his designee(s) or upon my separation from the Select Committee,
any classified material whichzas come into my possession a8 &
result of my employment or 2s. signment with the Select Committee-
I hereby agree that the burden is.on me to' determine if
inforrqation is classified and that I will never divulge, publish or
reveal by word, writing, conduct or otherwise any classified
information which has come to my knowledge as
2 result of my
employment or assignment with the Select Committee without prior
written consent of the Chairman or the President of the Senate or
their duly authorized reprcsentative.
by
==================================================
Page 10
==================================================
13-00000
I hercby agree that any information learned during my
employment or assignment with the Select Committce which is related
to intelligcnce and prepared publication by me will be submitted to
the Chairman or the President of thc Senate or their duly authorized
representative prior to discus: with OI showing to any publisher,
editor or
literary agent for the purpose of detcrmining Whether: said
material contains any classified information as defined in Executive
Order 11652. Iagtee that the Chairman of the: Select Comrittee,
President of the Senatc or their duly authorized representative ha s
the authority to make the final determination as to whether information
i8 classified 2nd thus should be deleted from the material submitted.
I have been informed of the provisions of 18 U.S. C_ 793, 794,
798 and 952; and 50 U:S.C. 783 (b); and 42 U,S.C. 2274; and Executive
Order. 11652, all of which relate to the protection of classified infor _
mation, and understand their meaning:
Further _ I agree to abide by such rules and procedures 2s the
Select Comrittee shall institute for the protection of classificd material.
I understand that 2ny breacl of any part of the obligations in this agree-
ment could subject me to legal and/or administrative action-
I further agree that all the conditions and obligations irposed
on me with respect to the protection of" classified information by this
agreement and applicable security regulations apply during my employ -
ment or assignment and continue after that relationship has terminated.
I take the obligations set forth above freely and without any
mental reservations Or purpose of evasion-
Signature
Date
WITNESS:
Signature
Datc
for
sing
==================================================
Page 11
==================================================
13-00000
GUIDES FQR PROTECTION OF CLASSTEIED INFORMA TTON
AND DOCUMENTS FURNISHED THE SELECT COMMITTEES
Personnel Security _Clearznces
(2) Background Investigetion
It would be desirable for the Select Committees to stipulete
that no staff personnel is to be given access to any classified material,
testimony Or information received
or generated by the committees
without prior receipt of & security clearance basea on a full field
investigation.
@} Secrecy Agreement
It would be &esirable for the Select Committees to require &
Bigned secrecy agreerent of employees or indivicuals assigned to
the committees staffs. The agreerent should include provisions:
1) That acceptance of committee secrecy regulations
is a condition precedent of employment or assignment;
2) Recognizing US Government property rights to
classified information;
3) Requiring prior written 'consent before divulgence
of olassified information;
4) For recognition that breach of the secrecy rules
and obligations contained in the agreement could subject
the signer to administrative and/or legal action under
appropriate statutes;
5) That there is no time limit on the tcrms of the
agreement.
==================================================
Page 12
==================================================
13-00000
2. Physical and Document_Security
The Select Committees should adopt rules to insure that the
secrecy of any sensitive information received or generated by it be
preserved:' These rules should be made kown to the individuals
and agencies who will be called upon to present testimony or
materials- Among these should be rules Qp-physical security and
document security-
(a) Physical Security
It would be desirable if the Select Cormittees adopt the followving
rules related to physical security:
1} All classified material will be stored in safes for
Bifekeeping in the registry of the Joint Committee on Atomic
Energy or similar facility and handled in accordance with
the regulations of this registry for classified material:
2), Trventy-four-hour guard protection, supplerented
by anti-intrusion alarms, should be required on the storage
area,
3) Areas selected for use in closed session should
be guarded against entry by unauthorized persons-
4) The committees should arrange for the conduct of
audio countermeasures to preclude the possibility of
upauthorized Use-of transrhitters and/or recording devices:
It should be noted that & foreign clandestine transmitter
wa$
located in the Rayburn House Office Building on 12 February
1973.
5) At the end of each session of the Select Committees,
the hearing room should be examined by & cleared staff
officer who will secure any misplaced classified materizl
or waste..
==================================================
Page 13
==================================================
13-00000
6) Areas should be designated in which classified
material can be reviewed. These arcas shouid be
secure
against access by unauthorized personnel. Material should
not be removed from these areas for the sake Of convenience
except when necessary for the work of the committees and
should; pot_bertransported overnight to the office or residence.
of personnel of the committees.
(6) Document Security
1) Committees should select and identify & single
location and' specific personnel authorized to sign acknow-
ledgement of receipt Of classified materials provided to
the committees.
2) A 'sy stem of document control should be established
to permit control of elassified documents to provide for
accountability-
3} Duplication of documcnts should be controlled 50
a8 to require & record of the dosument reproduced, tbe
number of copies reproduced and the custodian or receiving
personnel- Reproduced classified documents should be
subject to the same controls as the original:
4)_ Appropriate arrangements should be-made for
the destruction of classified waste.
5) Transcripts. The committees Should give
consideration to the necessity of providing appropriate
security in the transcription of testimony by committee
transcribers. The committees may desire to charge each
agency presenting testimony with this responsibility- In
bome, if not all cases, this might include escort of
materials to the place of transcription, the secur of
carbons, waste and notes and the relurn of the transcribed
testimony to the committee for safekeeping in accordance
with cominittce rules.
3
ing
==================================================
Page 14
==================================================
13-00000
6) Early agreement should be reached on the
disposition of classified materials such &s storage
under seal in the National Archives- The question of
access should be determined by: the President of the
Senate or the Speaker of the House-
3 Compartmented Information
Therc is.some' extr emely sensitive information in the intelligence
community which is disseminated only to those who have a very strict
"need to know" in order to build, perfect, operate or handle the
material produced by extremely sensitive' foreigr-intelligence collection
programs. The sensitivity of these programs rests upon the vulner -
ability to countermeasures which 2 foreign government could easily
jstitute: if.details of the mezns of collection becate known; Thus,.
even individuals cleared for Secret information do not have acces:
to compartmcnted information unless they are required to have such
knowledge in the performance of their duties- This inforration is
handled in Compartrented Control Systems- It would be desirabie
if the Chairmen would adopt the Compartmented Control Systems on
these extrerely sensitive collection efforts and clear.only those
staff personnel with an absolute "need te know" about such systems,
and that documents related to such systems be handled in & compart-
mented fashion by the Select Committee. The responsible departrents
and agencies would be glad to advise and assist in any arrangements
the Chairmen would desire in this compartmented area.
4. Security Officer
It would be desirable if the committees appointed
a security
officer witk the responsibility of discharging the security rules adopted
the committee and of serving as 2
point of contact with the depart_
ments and agencies ofinterest to the committee: It would also be
desirable if the committee rules required each agency of interest to
identify & single point of contact to facilitate provisions of security
support required by the committee.
Top
by.
==================================================
Page 15
==================================================
13-00000,
ENTRAL INTECCIGENCE AGEN
ASHINGTON; D.C 20505
Leatro ?sty
75 - 22le
16 JUN 1975
Honorable Elmer B, Staats
Comptroller General of the United States
General Accounting Office
441 G Sireet
Washington, b_ C, 20548
Dear Mr . Siaats:
My ettention has been directed to a letter &om Mr. Keller General
Accounting Office, to the Honorable William Proxmire dated 10 , 1974 ,
which was placed in the Cong_essional Recordby Senator Proxmire on
February 1i, 1975. The letter deals with the- intelligence community and
reviews the General Accounting Office'sright to audit and obtain information
from the Central Intelligence Agency -
Inasmuch as Mr _ Keller has treated 2
subject basic to this Agency's
capability to carry out work mandated by Congress_ I.believe it would serve
2 useful purpose to reviewv some of the background concerning the use of
confidential [unds and their relationship to the audit o CIA over the years:
Mr - Keller notes in his lettes that there are "a fairly substantial number
of instances where expenditures are accounted for solely upon a certfication
by the hezd of the department or establishment involved 01 The need is clear
in the case %f this Agency: The necessity to safeguard certain truly vital
foreign intelligence secrets has been recognized by the Congress in its
directon to the Director of Central Intelligence to protect intelligence sources
2nd methods from unauthorized disclosure. This responsibility; wvas complemented
by zuthorizing certain expenditures "for objects of & Confidential, extraordinary ,
or emergercy nature, to be accounted for solely on the certificate @f the Director
of Centrzl Intelligence. Such expenditures.would apply , for example. to
2
secret agent operating abroad in a hostile climate whose identity must be
tected not only s0 that he can continue supplying the intelligence involved, but
2lso because his freedom--and Qn occasion his life--weighs in the balance.
Other intelligence activities do not hzve such obvious security reguire_
ments but are, nonetheless _ within the sources and methods concept. Liaison
with foreign intelligence and security agencies is extremely important in fields of
both positive intelligence and counterintelligence_ Such liaisons to be effective
depend on the confidence of each service that the other Ivill protect not the
mere fact of the relationships , but also its"sources and methods and sensitive
information Compromise of any of these brings not only protests from the foreign
liaison scrvice, but in SOme cases a lessening Or even cessation its cooperation
May
pro-
only
Ai?
Eee?x
==================================================
Page 16
==================================================
13-00000'
Even overt activities have their olvn security problems Thus, many U_ S.
citizens and others are willing to provide sensitive information to overt intelligencc
units on condition that thejr cooperation in this respectbe absolutely protected _
This need for the special protection of intelligence sources and methods has
been" well recognized by Officials in the executive, judicial , and legislative
branches of our Government _ Mir Lindsay C Warren , then Comptroller General
of the United States, in a letter dated March 12, 1948, to the Director Bureau of
tbe Budget;"addressed the provision granting the Director of Central Intelligence
tbe power to certify the expenditure o confidential funds by stating that wvhile it
provided M for the granting of much wider authority than I would ordinarily
recommend for Government agencies, generally::the purposes sought to be
obtained in the establishment of the Central Intelligence Agency are believed t
be of such paramount importance &s to justify the extraordinary measures pro-
posed therein_ n He went on to:say that the "necessity for secrecy in such matters
is apparent and the Congress apparently recognized this fully in that it provided
in secton .O2() ()-ofEublicLaw 253, that the Director %f Central Inteliigence
Shall-Fe7esponsible for protecting intelligence sources and methodg from
unautborized disclosure Under these conditioris; he' stated;" "I do riot feel
called Ypon to object to the proposals advanced
It has been and it remains the policy %f CIA to rely upon vouchered funds
wherever possible. (Vouchered furds are those which can be accounted for and
audited in;conformance with the laws that apply to other Government agencies
2nd with standard Government regulations and procedures.) Currently more
than half o the Agency's appropriations are disbursed as vouchered funds_
The confidential funds certification authority referred to by Mr . Warren in his
March 12, 1948 letter is reserved for "objects of a confidential, extraordinary ,
or emergency nature-"
From the beginning o CIA records for alf vouchered fund expenditures
were made available to and were subject to a voucher audit the GAO _ Use f
the voucher audit procedure allowed the GAO to examine expenditure and
collectioF vouchers and related documents t0 determine whether experditures
were made'legally and solely for the objects for which appropriations were made-
Use of the voucher audit procedure also allowed CIA to protect those activities of
2 confidential, extraordinary , or emergency nature, i.e. intelligence sources
and methods _
Subsequent to the ezactment-of the CIA legislatior, GAO adopted &
"comprehensive audit approach; m and raised Tvith the CIA Subcommittee of tbe
House Armed Services Committee the desirability % 2n expanded audit of Agency
activities. The Comptroller General stated by letter dated 29,, 1959 to
Subcommittee Chairman Kilday that he did "not recommend any change in section 10
(now section 8) of the Central Intelligence Act" and that broadening of our
audit activities should not include an evaluation of the intelligence activities of
the Agency h
only
by
May
"any
==================================================
Page 17
==================================================
13-00000
Mr Allen Dulles , ti Director of Ccntral Intelligenc Jgrced that GAO
should expand its current audit activities in a letter to the Comptroller datcd
October 16, 1959, cautioning, however that the comprehensive audit would have
to be limited so as to remain outside the area of sensitive security operations for
which by lawv the Director's certificate must be deemed & sufficient voucher
:The results of the trial period of comprehensive audit from 1959 to 1961
were fadeknown to the CLA Subcommittee in a letter of 16, 1961 from the
Comptroller General in which he said the GAO planned to' discontinue the audit
of CLA activities_ He acknowledged that various steps were taken by the CIA "to
plece the General Accounting Office in
a
position to make & comprehensive audit
of the overt activities of CIA 0 Nevertheless, he stated that GAO "cannot effectively
reviewv and evaluate activities of the Support Component because the confidential
and overt activities 0f this component are integrpted t0 such an extent that we
cannot make reasonably comprehensive 2udits_ II He further stated have been
given suffciept access to malce reasonably comprekensive reviews of the overt
activities of the Intelligence Component, but such reviews, in Our; Opinion,.will not
be productive 0f significant evaluations because we cannot 'feasibly evaluate te
ertent to Ihich needed overt information is available for collection or determine-
the need for the intelligence infornation selected for collation and use in' the pro
duction of intelligence reports." In short, the Comptroller General was recognizing
the conflict between the philosophy underlying a "comprehensive andit approach"
and the Director"s statutory responsibility and authority to protect intelligence
sources ard methods _
Both the Director and Chairman Vinson, of the House Committee on Armed
Services_ requested that the Compiroller General continue to audit Agency affairs
on & limited basis, but after another trial period the Comptroller General reiterated
his earlier view _ In a letter to Chairman Vinson dated June 1962, tHe Comptrolle
General stated his belief that for maximum effectiveness "it would be necessary
for Our GAO audit staff to have nearly completa access to CIA activities 0 and
that even to' "perform reasonably comprehensive reviews would require "complete
access to the administrative activities that are performed in support of both
sensitive and nonsensitive operations of CIA _ J
Chairman Vinson replied to the Comptroller General on July 18, 1962 ,
stating thzt, "the restrictions you met within the Central Intelligence Agency
are necessary I believe for the proper protection %f its intelligence activities
and should be maintained_ ) The Chairman agreed , however that in view of
the Comptroller General's opinion that & continued audit ivas not a worthwhile
effort, GAO might withdraw from further audit activities in the Central Intelligence
Agency:_
In summary, I believe that several points are deserving of emphasis in
essessing the nature and history of GAO's audit activities with respect to this
Agency:
3
May
nwe
21,
==================================================
Page 18
==================================================
13-00000
(a) CIA coopel ed fully in all respects in extcn: hg
administrative support and in granting security clearances
and access to information related to vouchered fund activities_
() The Chairman of the interested oversight committce
in the House of Representatives was fully informed of the nature
and status of the activity :
(c) This Agency encouraged GAO to conduct and to
continue to conductits activities consistent with tbe operational
and statutory requirements imposed upon this Agency _
Ca) The: decision to discontinue the audit activities
was' made solely by GAO and was approvedlby the Chairman
of the House Armed Services Committee.
Sincereky
Iai Lok
W.E.
Director
Distribution:
~ Addressee
3 DCI
1-,DDCT
1 ~ER
17OGC
1 + DDA
} Compt
OF 3
~ OS
~
OLC Subject (GAO) wlbasic:
1 3 OLC Proxmire fle
}FOLC Chrono
OLC:WPY:cg (13 Jun 75) s
= 5
SL Hv hs I}
9 | Hnc
Colby
Orig
3
==================================================
Page 19
==================================================
13-00000
25.3
'DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTZLLIGENCE 38
WASHINGTON, D. C 20505 REVIEW STAFF
7;208/
28 JUL 1w;
Hsc_ M&
The Honorable Otis G_ Pike Chairman
Select Comittee 0n
intelllgence
House of Representatives Sic+oa
Washington, D: C: 20515
Dear Mr _ Chairman:
In our conversation on Friday asked for the statutory
basis for the compartmentation principle- I wish first to
respond to yout inquity and then suggest a manner in which your
staff can receive access to the sensitive material protected
by special compartnentation systems
The curtent basis for the U.S. Government security
classification system is Executive Order 11652 promulzated
on 8 March 1972 Historically foreign inteligence has
been treated 2s. one' category Of classified national security
information_ There are nunerous statutory recognit:ons of
the importance of national security information
>
e.g: the
Freedon of Infornation Act_ Consequently much foreign
intelligence is classified CONPIDENTIAL SECRFT
or TOP
SECRET according to. specifications set forth in the Order:
Not all foreign intelligence however is classified national
security information under.the
Provisis
ons of the Executive
Order (e:g. , an American source providing foreign information
or assistance) Also, the potential risks attendant: with
the compromise of a
foreign intelligence source or method
differ Substantially from the risks attendant with much
classified defense information.
Section 102 () (3) 0f the National Security Act of 1947,
as amended, des : "That the Director Of Central Intel-
ligence
ledal]tovis
be responsible for protecting intelligence
soutces and methods from unauthorized disclosure :" In
Tecc= tion of this responsibility , National Security
Council Intelligence Directive No 1 (17 February 1972)
instructs the Director of Central Intelligence to
develop and review security standards and practices -as
they relate to the protection of intelligence and of
intelligence sources and methods from unauthorized disclosure _
You
gni
==================================================
Page 20
==================================================
13-00000
2 -
Since the National Security 'Act did not provide for
an authority
corresponding With the DCI 5 responsibility in this area
the Directive provides that the Members of the U.S.
ifeeiligence
Board are responsible for: "The supervision of the dissemination
and security of: intelligerce material." The Director of Centzal
Intelligence acting with the advice of the U.S . Intelligence
Board, has 'promulgated a .number 0f directives, regulations
and security manuals related to the protection 0f foreign
intelligence and foreign intelligence sources and methods
and appiicable
to the overall U:S_ {gfelligence community.
The' fundamental' security principle involved in the: pro:
tection Of foreign intelligence and. of its soutces and methods
is ax strict application 0f "need to: know" ~ Principle
referted to in Executive Order 11652 Section 6 (A) This
'applies the' simple_ mathenatical premise that the fewer the
number of individuals made: privy to a secret; the less likely
that it will be disclosed_ The security principle of
"compartmentation": involving: Special
access and information
dissenination controls is designed to ensure that only those
individuals whose "need to know" has been specifically
approved by some higher authority, Who have been specially
indoctrinated, ana who; undertake special commitments to
ptotect it are Provided aceess to a particularly sensitive
category 0f foreign intelligence sources and. methods
Corpartnentation' assists in the of the "need-to-
know" principle by ensuring that
aBndividio
duals are provided:
access to oniy that information clearly essential to the
performance of their duties_
Compartnentation Was undoubtedly
a
major contributing
factor involved in; the nation's secret development 0f the
atomic.bomb during World War II
>
and the principle is still
implicit in security procedures related to. ERDA S "RESTRICTED
DATA" as reflected in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. In the
field 0f U.S. foreign intelli_ activities compartmentation
was practiced throughout the
Yeveiopcenr
and operation of the
U-2 reconnaissance program. One of the major foreign
intelligence categories 0f activities us_ formalized con-
partmentation procedures today involves the matter 0f
foreign signals intercept for intelligence purposes i.e.
) communications intelligence_ Title 18 0f the U.S_
Code
Section 798 recognizes the special character of this
material by providing specifically for prosecution 'for the
unauthorized disclosure: of information concerning any
communications activities 0f the United 'States without the
ing
==================================================
Page 21
==================================================
13-00000
"3-
necessity to show intent to
harm the United States_ The
reason for the application of strict compartmentation Pro -
cedures to communications intelligence and other foreign
intelligence activities reflects the extreme vulnerabiiity
0f the sources Once an opposition becomes awvare of which
of its comunications Ie: are intercepting, it can teke swift
remedial action , and the source can be forever lost-
On Friday afternoon ,; . copies of the secrecy oath used
by the executive branch: with respect to three compartmented
access control systems were
made avaiiable to you along with_
the revised forms: developed for and executed by certain members
of: the staff 0f the: Senate Select Commi ttee to Study Intelligence
Activities_ I would hope_ that the enclosed egreement modified
for the House Select Comnittee, combining.all three:
compartments into one document would meet your particular
concerns
For your information in addition to the Senate Select
'Conmittee S use
Of the modified secrecy oath dealing.with
conpartnented access: the following House and Senate comnittees
have obtained compartmented access: for their' staffs , which
was:' granted after the norma] briefings and Signing Of the
secrecy oatii:
Armed Services Committee
Appropriations Conmittee
Aeronautical and Space Sciences: Committee
May. I reiterate the points I made on Friday:
a. No. material is being withheld from members of
the Comnittee_
b We are prepared to and did brief the staff 0f the
Committee on noncompartmented matters
7
based upon Your
certification of their security clearance and the fact
that_they entered into an appropriate secrecy agreement
with You, 2 copy of which You provided.
c The compartmentation procedures of the
Intelligence Community have been established
to statute and National Security Council
hedellfsence
Directives _ The simglest way for the staff to obtain
access to this compaftmented material would be to
accept the normal sectecy atrangements as modified
in the enclosed . This would ensure against difficulties
in access to such compartmented material throughout the
==================================================
Page 22
==================================================
13-00000
Intelligence Commiity It is clear that the
obligations assued here would run between the staff
member and the Committee and in no way would provide
any control or influence over them by me or any .
element 0f the Intelligence Community _
a. It would: undoubtedly be feasible to develop
another procedure to ensure special protection 0f the
sensitive matters' currently included in the compart-
mented, systems but this would involve review and
discussions with various interested parties which
would' undoubtedly take: some time and' delay your
investigations_
E bope you will agree that this is the simplest and
easiest manner of solving
2 practical natter So that we can
proceed with the substance of your. investigations
Sincerely
UEC
W E. Colby
==================================================
Page 23
==================================================
13-00000
Distribution:
1-DCI
1-DDCI
1-IG
I-OLC
1-E.H.Knocke:
1-SCMDCI
Nhite House Distribution:
1-Rod: Hills:
1-Phil Buchen
1-Jay French
==================================================
Page 24
==================================================
13-00000
CONFIDENTIAL
COMPARTMENTED INTELLIGENCE INDOCTRIMATION
I have been inforned that pursuant to 1aw (Sections 792
793,_ 795, 797 ana 798 0f. Title 18 , United States Code) I
am not to discuss: with
oT disciose to .any person any infornation
relating directly
or indirectly to the below identified compaft
mented Programs unless such person is currently authorized to
discuss 0r receive such informa-ion .0r material of the particular
category involved_+ I; &m aware that the responsibility 0f
asceftaining that Such 2n authorization for another: person is
valid 2nd current rests with me _
I acknowledge_ that it is my responsibility to inforn
myself Qf the:: contents' 0f the above mentioned sections Of
Title: 18 , U.S: Code_ a5._ they: pertain to performance of mY
duties I an avate further that if 2 change in mY status
renders: it no Zonger; necessary for me to receive compartrented
intelligence, my name kill 'be "removed from the list Of persons
authorized to_ receive such meterial_
News Reaia repofts concerning eny of these conpartnented
materials does not relieve me of: nY' obligation under the oath
Signed below
I ackowledge: that I have been briefed 0n the" folIowing
compar:nented systens or prograns:
OATH ` OF SECRECY
I do solemnly
swear that I will not discuss sith or
disclose to any person , regardless of his official position
or status_
0
any information directly or indirectly to
Compartnented Intelligence,
relytinfozizeic
any derived therefrom,
or the nature of the sources of such intelligencc until I
have ascertained that such person has been
2uthorized
to discuss
CONFIDENTIAL
E-2 IMPDET
CL BY
794,
==================================================
Page 25
==================================================
13-00000
CONFIDENTIAL
and handle this material and that his authorization has not
been revoked , except in the performance of my official duties
on the staff of the House Select Committee on
Intelligence and
in accordance with the requirenents set: forth in the rules Of
such Connittee.
77102537- Signature
Witness Date
CONFIDENTIAL
==================================================
Page 26
==================================================
13-00000
Uuiiuliniiz
fil
CE RAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
WASHINGTON,D.C; 20505
HSC Mat . Fuln.
Review Staff: 75[2563
20 August 1
Mr. A Searle Field Sec
Staff Director
'#sc
Select Committee on Intelligence D- d/s
Room 232
Cannon House Office Building.
Washington D.C._ 20515
Dear Mr. Field:
Around the end of Mr. Roeder, obviously impressed
by your admonitions about the need for security, asked if I
could work up a package of guidance on how to handle classified
documents _ Our Office of Security this together, and while
I think Mr_ Roeder had in mind sornething more applicable to
an individual than to an office, I thought I would pass this on to
you for whatever use You care to make of it.
Incidentally, we have not carried out the;physical survey
of your quarters which you requested o 29 July. Ihave been
in touch with Ms. Hess, and our Office of Security will conduct
one as soon as she is ready. We may have some other recor-
mendations for your consideration when that is done.
Sincerely,
le
Jerrold B_ Brown
Assistant to the Director
Attachment: a/s
cC: DOS
ATIORAL SEcUITY INFORMATHON Clzcs:icd by_023ILT
9
Unjuthzrized Disztosuc Subjcct lo Exazp: {rori C;n3;,l b3#a
Ctiminz} Seactions. Sckes &f E.O_ 1G32. 2x
Cuegor;: 53 (V};, i), 43} <r 1778-1976 CONFIDENTHAL
Dclcss,;icd' &ly C;) Fprovzi %f ;il9
Direetcr cf Cesirai In; ligels?
975
ecvr Iy
July,
put
yet
Revolutiov
1
1
==================================================
Page 27
==================================================
13-00000
EOUFVEMAL
1 4 AUG 1975
MEMORANDUNM FOR: The Review Staff
ATTENTION B . Jerrold B Brown
VIA Acting Deputy Director for Adninistration
SUBJECT House Select Committee on Intelligence
Protection of Classified Materials
REFERENCE Meno dtd 31 Jul 75 to D/Sec from Jerrold
B Brown, subject: Requast for Security
Aids
Id accordance with the request in the raferencad
nemorandun for a "package" to be used by the House Select_
Committes on
Inteliigence for the protection of classifiad
material, the attached suggestions are provided for Your
assistance In view of the Jack of 8 comprehensive phys -
ical security survey 0f tha area which will be used to
store the Connittee 5 classified material, specific Tec-
omendations must b8 deferred. In this comnection, we
plan to have Mr _ Edward J. McGrath Of the Physical Security
Division (extension 3494) meet with appropriate represent-
ativas of the Committeo for the specific purpose 0f con-
ducting a security survey of the proposed" quarters in the
Rayburg Building; For Your Sefectatoittes Mr_ Searlo Field,
Staff Dlrector of the Hlousa Select on
Intelligence,
requested such 2 survey on 29 July 1975 _ Pending the rB-
sults of tbis survey and its recomendations_
9
tbe attached
general physical securIty measures aro recomended in an
Bffort to provide the requisite protection for the Con -
mittee ' s clasgified material.
22pzz;
Robert M Gambino
Director 0f Security
Atts.
Distribution: ES . IMPDET
8 2 Adse CL BY 056966
1 ADD/A
OS 5 12 065
CONFIDENTAL
Orig
==================================================
Page 28
==================================================
13-00000
ATTACHMENT
==================================================
Page 29
==================================================
13-00000
COHFIDEHAL
GENERAL SUGGESTIONS
FOR THE
PROTECTION OP CLASSIFIED MATERIAL
1 Designate a Committee. member 25 the Security
Officer responsible for the overall control
handling and protection of the classified
material_
2 Establish and maintain a
registar of all
Conmittee personnel who are authorized to
roview classified naterial and insure that
dO unauthorized personnel will have access :o
the materials
3 Establish a central document control systei
whereby a1l classified docuwonts are properly
logged upon receipt and annotated as to
disposition_
Dasignate 3 Document Control Clerk wko Mill
b0 Specifically responsible for the logging
and control of all classified material-
Appropriate records should be established
to reflect that all clessified material is
properly in and out by dato and tine,
to authori
Ze83ed
members of the Committee.
5 In the evont material is designated a5 being
0f 2 codeword Or
compartmented nature, special
physical security features a5 enunciated by
tha Aa Hoc Security Committee of the Unitad
States. Intelligence Board and later adopted
as policy should ba adhered to (Spacifics
regarding these requirenents will be provided
in the course of the pending survey.)
6 A1l guards assigned to the physical security
control ovBr the Committea ' $ storage area
should be U . 5. citizens and possess @PpIO -
priate security clearancas
7 , If feasible,
a reading room should be es-
tablished within the designated storage area
CONFIDEMTAL
==================================================
Page 30
==================================================
13-00000
CONFIDENTHAL
for the Committee' $ classified material, and
all research and roview activities of the
material should be restrictad to this area,
8 _ In those Iostances where the Comnittee meets
in Executive session , every effort should
ba made to insure that the site being used has
been subjected to a technical security inspec-
tion to negate the possibility of uauthorized
transmitting or recording devices _ This area
of concern could pose setious security deficien-
cies in the event tha sam0 aroa would be used
initially in public session and then closed for
the Executive session without such an inspection
being made.
9_ Adequats safoguards should be utilized in the
transnisslon of classified ma terial udar the
cognizance of the Committee from one area to
another
10 _ Reproduction of portion of the Committee' $
classified
nateriat B8o.i8
be Prohibited
without the express approval of the Staff
Director In this instance , notes_ extracts,
summaries, etc-, made
fzof &lassified material
mus : eIs0 bo provided the same degree 0f
protection as that provided to the sourCe
matorial.
11. Access controls to the storage and reten-
tion area snould bo established to insuro that
only authorized personnel are allowed entrance .
12_ Storege of a11 clasgified material should be
within the designated area a5 opposed to any
areas or outside offices-
13_ Security protection should be provided to
211 Comittee transcripts during the tran-
scription process as
we1l &5 during the
periods while they are in transit:
14_ A security,check procedure should ba estab-
lished to inspect the areas where the Con -
mittee weets at the tormination of each
sossion to insure that no classifiod material
2
CONFIQENThAl
==================================================
Page 31
==================================================
13-00000
CONFIDENTHAL
or notes, etc, at0 inadvertently left W -
secured.
(Attached
are examples of Security
Chock Sheets.)
15. Arrangenents should ba nade to insura that
there ara adequate facilities for the
destruction of Classified wasto naterial.
In this instance such wasto naterial should
be provided protection until its final
destruction.
16 _ Only approved classified naterial destruc-
tion nethods should be utilized_ (Details
regarding this can ba obtained in the coutsO
0f tha pending survey.)
17 . A11 Comnittee personnel granted access to
classifiod naterial by the Staff Director
should be briefed on their obligations end
fesponsibillties regarding tha unauthorized
disclosura of such matorial
18 . Specific physical security recommendations
applicab le ta tho proposed storage arba for tho
Committae's classified matarial, consistent
with sound security principles must be deferred
until the coapletion 0f the survey This would
also includa recommendations relative to tho
type 0f storage containers Ihich the Committee
proposes to uSe.
19 _ Pending the completion of 2 security survey at
tne new storage site, it,i5 suggested that the
protective measures currently in effect at tho
temporary storage facility: in Room 232 , Cannon
Buiiding, not be changed.
CANFIDENTIAL
==================================================
Page 32
==================================================
13-00000
ATTACHMENT
==================================================
Page 33
==================================================
13-00000
SECURITY CHECK SHEeT SECUaiTy CHECK SHEET
To OfEice of Security IRoom No; BUICOING SAFENo.
ThRu: Component Security Officer FROM:
To Lock To Lock
RotATE DIAL four Consecutive TuRNS IN OnE direction ROTATE DIAL Four consEcUtive TURNS IN ONE directioN
To CHECK To CHECK
32E8' DEPREss contROL DrAWER LATCH While DEPRESSING SAFESt DEPREsS CONTROL DRAWER LATCh While Depressing
EACH DRAWeR LATCH AND Pull out Both DRAWERS, ON EAcH DRAWER LATCH AND PulL out both DRAWERS: ON
'Herring-HALL-MARVIN' SAFES' Turn DRAWER HANDLE To Right 'HERRINO-HALL-MARViN 'SAFES TuRN DRAWER HANOLE To Right
(on now syp0, rleo Iateh) AND PulL DRAWERS OUTWARD: (a nom [Yp0, s4lbo Iateh) AND Pull DRAWeR] OUTWARD:
VAULIS AND DoQaSAEES: TURN HANDLE BACK AnD Forth VAULIS AND Door34FES: TuRN HANDLE BACK AND Forth
WhiLe PuLLinG Door OUTWARD: While Pulling Door QUTWARD,
ALARM swITCHES: TurN To "Night Position ALARM SMITCHES: TURN To "Nioht Position
CERTIFICA TION CERTIFICATION
7 CERTIFY, By Hy INITIALS BELOw; THAT HAVE OPENED OR [ CERTIFY, BY MY INITALS BELOY, THAT HAVE OPENED OR
PROPERLY SECURED THIS VAULT, SAFE OR CABINET AND ALARM PROPERLY SECURED THIS VAULT, SAFE OR CABINET AND ALARH
Month(s)
8
Month(s)
D OPENED BY CLOsED By CheCked BY GUARD check
1
OPENED BY CLOSED BY CHECKED DY GUARD CheCk
INItiALs TIME INITIALs TImE iNitiALs Time IniTiALs Time
#FNtiats
Time {INITIALS TIME fNITiALs Time INITIALS TImE F
1
8
1
1
orm (3) 1-63
108 OBSOLEtE PrEviOUS Editions
==================================================
Page 34
==================================================
13-00000
Area Security Check Sheet
Items to be Checked Checker
Desks (Including Drawers)
Tables (Including Drawers)
Chairs
Floor
Window Ledges
Typewriters
Stenotype Machines
Reproduction Equipment
Trash Receptacles
Charts Exhibits,
Chalkboards
Notebooks Paper Pads
>
etc.
(Check to insure that
imprints of classified
notes not present)
==================================================
Page 35
==================================================
13-00000
UNCLASSIFiED Uss 38
BQNFIQEMTIAL =
CONFI . NTIAL SECRET
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
SUBJECT: (Optional) House Select Committee on
Intelligence
Protection of Classified Materials
FROM: EXTENSION No_ IzA_tl752563_ 2 Au6 7f
Director of Security 6777
DATE
1 4 Aug 1925
TO: (Officer designotion, Toom number , ard DATE
building) OFFICER"$ COMMENTS (Number oach comMenf to show From whom
INITIALS t whom, Draw lino Ocross column aftor each commant:)
RECEIVED FORWARDED
Edward Ryan Itucksr 7s8
BBACoxedinator
2_
ADD/A
7D- 26 Hqs _
3
The Review Staff
ue
6 D- 0120 Sey
Mo Jr
5,Attn: Mr JerroTd B. BBrown
6
8
10.
12.
13_
15.
FO87 610 Usedir iqus SECRET
Dowhanai
IMTERNAL UNCLASSIFIED
USE ONLY
==================================================
Page 36
==================================================
13-00000
CONFUBEHTHAL
1 4 AuG 1975
MEMORANDUM FOR: The Review Staff
ATTENT ION Mr Jerrold B Brown
VIA Acting Deputy Director for 'Administration
SUBJECT House Select Committee on Intelligence
Protection of Classified Materials
REFERENCE Memo dtd 31 Jul 75 to D/ Sec from Jerrold
B Brown , subject: Request for Security
Aids
In accordance with the request in the referenced
memorandum for a "package" to: be used by the House Select
Committee on Intelligence for the protection of classified
material, the attached suggestions are provided for your
assistance In view of the lack of a
comprehensive phys -
ical security survey of the area which will be used to
store the Committee:'s classified material specific rec-
ommendations must be deferred. In this connection , we
plan to have Mr Edward J McGrath of the Physical Security
Division (extension 3494) meet with Spec{RRc Purpos
represent-
atives of the. Comittee for the purpose of con -
ducting
3 security survey 0f the proposed quarters in the
Rayburn Building For your information Mr Searle Field,
Staff Director of the House Select
Comittee
on Intelligence,
requested such a survey on 29 July 1975 _ Pending the re
sults of this survey and its recommendations the attached
general physical security measures are recommended in an
effort to. provide the requisite protection for the Com -
mittee ' s classified material
Robert W . Gambino'
Director of Security
Atts _
Distribution: E3 IMPDET
Orig 8 2 Adse CL BY 05.6966
1 ADDIA
0S 5 12 065
CONFIDENThAL
==================================================
Page 37
==================================================
13-00000
SECRET
Tepei] frow ^
THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE #Ed:e" 07>
WASHINGTON; . C:' 20505
Intelligence Community Staff DCI/IC 75-2620
2 September 1975
MEMORANDUM FOR: Member s of USIB 'Ad Hoc Coordinating Group
SUBJECT House Select Committee on Intelligence
Attached is a paper from the Chairman, USIB Security
Committee, outlining security arrangements made by the House
Select Committee on Intelligence.
(wA € -huo
Jack E. Thoma s
Major} General, USAF (Ret. )
Chief; Coordination Staff, ICS
Attachment
This Document Be Downgraded
to Unclassified When Removed From
Attachment
CLASSIFIED Si
356793
Eshft F3o4 GENERAL DECL,ASSIFICATIOY
Sclisi le CF E 0. 18352, Exe::PIion CaTECORY:
8 58(! , (. (3} or {4) (circle 076 Qt mjro)
Ai; maTicALLY DECLASSIFIED UN
Date_In2)s sible_to_Determine
ualess impoeg ble, inaert dale uI rvent) SECRET
May
==================================================
Page 38
==================================================
13-00000
SECRET
UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE BOARD
SECURITY COMMITTEE
SECOM-D-105
2 September 1975
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Coordination Staff, ICS
SUBJECT House Select Committee on Intelligence
On 29 August 1975 , Mr , Robert Gambino, Director of
Security / CIA; Mr . William H. Standiford, Deputy Chief, Physical
'Security Division, Office of Security/CIA; and I viewed the
permanent space of the staff of the House Select Committee on
Intelligence at the invitation of Mr _ A. Searle Field, Staff Director
of the Committee. We believe the security arrangements made
and being made are satisfactory for the storage of compartmented
information. Attached is a memorandum' outlining the security
arrangements.
'17ac44 )i1czxa
Donald E. Moore
Chairman
Attachment
This Document Be Downgraded
to Unclas sified When Removed From
Attachment
ClASsified EY 356793
ExEmiPT Fc3m GENERAL DECLASSIFICTION
SCIIEDCLz Cf E. 0 11352, ExexfTion CATEGORy:
8 SE(; (, (3) or {4) (circlc onc or more)
Ai;ioi TicALLY DECLASSIFXED ON
Date Impos sible to Determine
(unless impossible, insert da(c 0r event) SECRET
May
==================================================
Page 39
==================================================
13-00000
OLUOLI
2 September 1975
Houge Select Committee_on Intelligence
1 The House Select Committee staff is now located in its
permanent space, B-316, Rayburn Building. Ms _ Jacqueline Hess
is the Securz Officer, telephone number 225-9696.
2. The only entrance is through B-316 and the space consists
of several adjoining offices all served by an inner walkway. A member
of the Capitol Police is stationed at & guard desk inside the door and
admits authorized individuals _ Visitors must sign in with the
guard, who' calls the appropriate staff employee and visitors are
allowed access to the space only in the company of staff employees_
Interview rooms are located in the staff area but separated from the
work area During non-work hourg two ds are on in the
space.
3. All classified material is kept in,a secure area atthe:
rear of the space with one entrance to the secure rooma This room
is to be locked at all times when specified,erployees are not on
in the room. At the present time, Ms , Hess is the only one
who will be able to open the secure area and unles8 circumstances
change this arrangement will continue_
4 . All classified material is kept in this secure area, and
stored in approved safes with three-way combination locks. At
present, Ms . Hes8 i8 the only person who possesses the combination
to,these,safes.
5 . R eading of classified documents is to be in
a reading area,
consisting of several tables, in the secure area_ A staff employee
desiring access to a clas sified document must make a request for
Ms . Hess then obtains it, the employee reads it in the secure
area and it is then returned to Ms. Hess for return to the safe
cabinet. Staff employees have been advised that notes.taken from
classified documents and material prepared from such notes or the
documents must respect the original classification and receive
corresponding security. Copying of classified documents i8 to be
strictly controlled, is to be done only on a copying device located
in staff S pace, and copie S are to receive the same security protection
a8 the original.
CLASSIFIE; 57 356793
Exemi?1' !rom GEERAL ECi.aSSIFICATION
SCIKEJUiE 37 E_ 0_ 11352, {etion CiteCozX:
8 SB(t:, i2;, () of (4) (circlc onc or more)
aij cmatically DEZLASSIFIED 0m
SECRET
Date ssible to Determin-
(uuless imfnssiisl, insert tn(e or ovtnt)
ity
only
duty guar
duty
it,
Impo
==================================================
Page 40
==================================================
13-00000
SECRET
6 The entire space has been swept and plans call
additional periodic sweeping. There is 3 motion detector in the
secure area which rings at the guard desk in the staff area and
also at the main office of the Capitol Police in the Rayburn Building
Tests have been made of this device and the response by the Capitol
Police wa s immediate. Two doors which nor mally serve as access
to the secure area from space occupied by other House Committees
have been secured from the inside and alarms are to be installed
on these doors.
7 Mr _ A_ Searle Field, Staff Director_ and Ms _ Hess:
advised that staff employees have been alerted to telephone security
and this will be continually stressed. Also have tried to instill
strong security consciousness among all the staff. Mr. Field
indicated that at present it is not expected the sfaff will total more
than 35.
SECRET
for
they
==================================================
Page 41
==================================================
13-00000
abk'_StRaThE inTermal USE $8" %
House Armed Services
Subcomittee on
Intelligence
and Military Application of Nuclear_Energy
The Subcommittee on Intelligence and. Military Application of Nuclear
Energy is newly established and the successor to the Special Subconittee
on Intelligence Chaired by Representative Lucien N. Nedzi_ The new Sub-
committee has" picked up the responsibility of the soon to be abolished
Joint Comittee on Atomic Energy: and is expanding its staff accordingly
Representative Melvin Price S Chairmanship is due to his years of
membership on the Joint Comittee on Atomic Energy _ There will be an ever-
increas_ involvement by the Subcommittee in military application of
nuclear energy and we undoubtedly will be called upon to provide required
foreign intelligence_
Members of the Subcomittee are as follows :
Melvin Price (D. Ill.) , Chairman
Charles H. Wilson (D. Calif.)
Jack Brinkley (D. Ga . )
Dan Daniel (D, Va . )
G_ V _ Montgomery (D. , Miss . )
Ronald V . Dellums (D_ Calif.)
Bob Carr (D. Mich.)
Charles E. Bennett (D. , Fla. )
Samuel S , Stratton (D. N.Y.)
Bob Wilson (R. Calif_
William L. Dickinson (R. Ala. )
Marjorie S _ Holt (R. Md . )
Robert W . Daniel, Jr_ (R. Va. )
Staff of the Subcommittee are as follows :
John Ford, Staff Director
William H. Counsel
Adam J. Klein, Professional
Mr _ Ford is Staff Director of the full Committee and replaced
Mr _ Frank Slatinshek, former Chief Counsel, who retired_ Mr _ Hogan is
Counsel of the Subcomittee and will be the principal staff man on Agency
matters . Adam Klein is a specialist in atomic energy matters _
AdxANISTTATIYE INTERAL 6JE OaL}
long
ing
Hogan ,
==================================================
Page 42
==================================================
13-00000
ADMIMISTRATWE INTERNAL USE ONLY
PROBLEMS
A House Subcommittee on Intelligence_ and Military_Application_of
Nuclear_Energy
Former Chairman Lucien N . Nedzi fully exercised his perogatives
as Chairman of the Subcommittee on Intelligence and we could look to
him for support in any problems developing with other committees and
other members of the House not on the Subcommittee_ Based on the
reactions of Chairman Melvin Price in the few instances that we have
approached hin in this Congress for assistance it is quite evident
that he is not the dominant' personality as was Chairman Nedzi and will
not stick his neck out to defend the Agency _ Nor does it appear that
the new staff director will be of the forceful personality as was
Frank Slatinshek who was very helpful in a number of problems _ A few
weeks ag0 former Chairman Nedzi suggested that we resolve a problem
involving Representative Donald M. Fraser by going to Speaker 0'Neill.
This may have been his indication to us that we may have to look to
House leadership to resolve problems _ Mr _ Nedzi also suggested that we
contact someone in the White House on a problem. We . may be faced with
needed White House support on a problem before we approach the leader-
ship.
B House Select Committee on Narcotics_Abuse and Control
The extent of Chairan Lester L. Wolff' s oversight of .the Agency
in Its narcotics collection activities still remains a looming problem.
As indicated by the request for the seal, Mr Wolff intends to extend
the Agency S activities to where there is maximum effective collection
of foreign ' intelligence on narcotics trafficking leading to arrest and
conviction without regard to the Agency 5 statutory prohibitions_ The
solution rests with the Attorney General and the White House giving
the Agency clear and precise guidelines to operate in this area which
the Agency can then point to in any disputes that may arise with the
Select Comnittee as to what the Agency 8 role should be.
ADXILHISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE CHLY
only
==================================================
Page 43
==================================================
13-O0000
PMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONT"
House of Representatives
(95th Congress, Ist Session)
DEMcRn TS
GEORGE E MAHON, Texas, Chairman
pab lccans
JAMIE L. WHITTEN, Mississippi ELFORD A. CEDERBERG, Michigan
ROBERT L F. SIKES, Florida ROBERT H MICHEL; Illinois
EDWARD P: BOLAND, Magsachusetts SILVIO 0_ CONTE, Massachusetts
WILLIAM H: NATCHER, Kentucky JOSEPH M, McDADE, Pennsylvania
DANIEL J. FLOOD, Pennsylvania MARK ANDREWS, North Dakota
TOM STEED, Oklahoma JACK EDWARDS, Alabama
GEORGE E SHIPLEY, Illinois ROBERT C McEWEN, New York
JOHN M. SLACK West Virginia JOHN T: MYERS, Indiana
JOHN J, FLYNT, Jr , Georgia J. KENNETH ROBINSON, Virginia
NEAL SMITH, Iowa CLARENCE E MILLER, Ohio
ROBERT N. GIAIMO, Connecticut LAWRENCE COUGHLIN, Pennsylvania
JOSEPH P. ADDABBO, New York C. W. BILL YOUNG, Florida
JOHN J. McFALL; California JACK F: KEMP , New York
EDWARD J PATTEN, New Jersey WILLIAM L. ARMSTRONG, Colorado
CLARENCE D. LONG, Maryland RALPH S. REGULA, Ohio
SIDNEY R. YATES, Illinois CLAIR W. BURGENER, California
FRANK E. EVANS, Colorado GEORGE M: OBRIEN, Illinois
DAVID R: OBEY, Wisconsin VIRGINIA SMITH, Nebraska
EDWARD R ROYBAL, 'California
LOUIS STOKES, Ohio KEITH F_ MAINLAND
GUNN McKAY, Utah Clerk and Staf Director
TOM BEVILL; Alabama
BLLL CHAPPELL; Florida
BILL D. BURLISON, Missouri
BILL ALEXANDER, Arkaneae
EDWARD I KOCH, New York
YVONNE BRATHWAITE BURKE, California
JOHN P. MURTHA, Penneylvania
BOB TRAXLER, Michigan
ROBERT DUNCAN, Oregon
JOSEPH D EARLY , Massachusetta
MAX BAUCUS, Montana
CHARLES WILSON, Texas
LINDY MRS HALE) BOGGS, Louisiana
ADAM BENJAMIN, Jr-, Indiana
NORMAN D. DICKS, Washington
Subcommittees
AGRICULTURE RELA TED Whitten, Evans, Burlison, Baucus, Traxler, Alexander, Sikes,
AGENCIES Natcher
Andrews, Robinson, Myers
DEFENSE Mahon, Sikes, Flood, Addabbo, McFall, Flynt, Giaimo, Chappell,
Burlison
Edwards, Robinson, Kemp
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Natcher; Giaimo, Wilson, McKay, Burke, Benjamin
Burgener, Kemp
FOREIGN OPERATIONS Long, Obey, Koch, Wilson, Yetes, Burke, Roybal, Stokes
Young, Conte, Smith
HUD -INDEPENDENT AGENCIES: Boland, Traxler, Baucus, Stokeg, Bevill, Boggs, Burlison,
Alexander
Coughlin, McDade, Young
INTERIOR McbedeceguLongEtong Murthe, Duncan, Dicks, Whitten
Armstrong
LABOR_HEALTH, EDUCATION Flood; Natcher, Smith, Patten, Obey, Roybal, Stokeg, Early
WELFARE Michel, Conte, O Brien
LEGISLATIVE Shipley, Benjamin, Giaimo, McFall, Murtha, Traxler
Armstrong; Coughlin;, Cederberg
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION McKay, Sikes, Murtha, Steed, Long, Chappell
McEwen, Regula
PUBLIC WORKS Bevill, Boland; Whitten, Slack, Boggs, Dicks, Shipley, Chappell
Myers, Burgener, Smith
STATE, JUSTICE; COMMERCE Slack; Smith; Flynt, Alexander; Burke, Early
& JUDICIARY Cederberg, Andrew8, Miller
TRANSPORTATION McFall, Steed, Koch, Duncan, Benjamin, Smith, Addabbo, Evang
Conte, Edwards; @ Brien
TREASURY-POSTAL SERVICE Steed, Addabbo, Roybal, Patten, Boland, Flynt
GENERAL GOVERNMENT Miler, McEwen
NOTE: Mr: Mahon, &8 Chairman of the Committee and Mr; Cederberg: 29 Renking Minority
Member; are ex ofcio members of all subcommittees of which are not regular members
OPo 86288-b Janvarv %0, 1077 .
4e
they
==================================================
Page 44
==================================================
13-00000
~Qusts
C
aZ~ 524'
House Appropriations Committee team:
Room 2 D 0117 Telephones : 5848 , 5849 (B) and 1570 (R) 880/
Leonard MJ (Bucky) WALTERS
Badge: blue House Committee
Clearances: SI TK, BYECOM
8
Charles 8. '(Chuck) HAYNES
green nozescort
Clearances: SI
)
TK, BYECOM
Eugene B_ XILHELM
Badge: Mue House Committee
Clearanges : 1 BYECOM
George C BAIRD (Carter)
Badge; blue House Committee
Clearances: SI, TK , BYECOM
Leon F (Frank) SCHWARTZ
Badge: blue House Committee
Jehn LayteA
Supervisory officials of HAC Surveys 8 Investigations Staff
(not to be stationed at Hqs bldg, but may visit from time to
time) :
Cornelius' R_ (Lefty) ANDERSON, Chief
Badge: green no-escort
Marion S . RAMEY Deputy Chief
Badge: blue House Committee
OX 7-9371
James Brian HYLAND
Badge: XIONWNEX blue House Committee
(x*1:
Badge:
TK,
==================================================
Page 45
==================================================
13-00000
2 August 1976
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Initial Meeting with House Appropriations
Committee Survey Group
1 An initial session wa s held on 30 July 1976 of
about one and a half hours with six persons from the Surveys
and Investigations Staff of the House Appropriations
Committee . to-discuss the purpose of their survey of the Directorete
of Operations and to propose some arrangements
to govern their access to Agency personnel and documents
The` following attended :
Mr Cornelius (Lefty) Anderson , Chief of
Surveys and Investigations Staff
Mr Marion Ramey Deputv
Mr Leonard
(Bucky)
Walters who will head the
team inspect the Directorate of Operations
Mr Charles (Chuck) Havnes team menber
Mr Eugene Wilhelm, team member (former
Agency employee)
Mr George C _ Baird , team member
Attending for the Agency were:
Mr Theodore Shackley , who chaired the meeting
Mr Robert Gambino
Mr Lyle Miller
Mr Thomas B_ Abernathy
Mr Richard Point
Mr Philip F . Fendig
2 _ The meeting followed reasonably well the attached
agenda which was made available to a11 at the beginning of
the meeting_ The following paragraphs summarize the
important points covered
3 , Scope: Mr Shackley asked the group to define its
mission
9
noting some of the topics mentioned in recent
conversations with Mr Snodgrass suggested particular
interests whereas the Committee S report on the FY 77 budget
Sh
ing
==================================================
Page 46
==================================================
13-00000
had suggested a different orientation Mr Anderson
) characterizing the enterprise a5 2 survey rather than an
investigation, stated that his instructions were from the
Chairman of the Committee : they called for a detailed
review of the operation of the Directorate in its entirety.
Mr Walters would mention certain particular interests
noted below
9
but that did not set limits to the ultimate
scope of the survey . Mr Walters then took over:
a He expects to do a complete review, from
the managerial and substantive standpoint of the
Directorate - His initial interests indicated an
auditor 5 approach to these questions how budgets
are compiled
>' examination of accounting procedures
for regular and special funds
9
cost systems and
the like _
b He went on however
)
to the management
aspects which they would also pursue to
determine the results of the Directorate ' s
operations the value of intelligence produced
versus the costs involved in procuring it and
areas of possible overlap in collection with
the military and with NSA
C Specific areas which would be explored
given =
9 as examples included contingency reserves,
the "special retirement fund" (presumably
referring to MHMUTUAL ) the procedures for
reimbursing the State
'Bepartment
for cover and
support proprietaries (how created their
justification
value and effectiveness) safe -
houses and
"CA
cadres _
Mr Anderson reluctantly agreed to Mr Shackley' s request
for a memorandum spelling out these objectives in sufficient
detail S0 that we could take the managerial steps necessary
to resolve any conflicts in the priority of the time of our
managers and senior operations officers who would be
involved in current operations as well a5 overlapping
inquiries from- other groups concurrently oversee the
Directorate Mr Anderson also asked for any ongoing studies
which the Directorate might have which would aid the team
in its work.
SFEET
2
ing
==================================================
Page 47
==================================================
13-00000
233
4 _ Duration: The team 5 first objective will be to
render an interim report to the Committee by 1 January 1977 _
9
in order to meet the mandate that the survey be used in
considering the Agency' s FY 1978 budget = The team wishes
to start work immediately and will consist of either Six or
seven memhers who will occupy space in Headquarters building
and presumably do most of their work here; it was brought
out
9
however, that the team would also interview users of
our intelligence and other collectors There was ambiguity
in the projection of the total length of the survey; I
interpreted Mr Anderson 5 remarks to indicate that he
expected the team to be with us for most of calendar Year
1977 _
5 , Security Mr Anderson explained the arrangement
by which the Comittee limits access by even the members of
the Subcommittee to the reports of his group; they must be
reviewed in a
specified area and they are stored in very
limited numbers in the tower of the Capitol in the special
facilities there for the Joint Atomic Energy Committee of
Congress Mr . Ganbino explained the arrangenents for badges ,
certification 0f clearances and provided for the team S
consideration a copy of the "non-disclosure agreement" which
we would like members to sign_ There was considerable
discussion_ and some objection, to the issuance of blue
badges which will provide access to virtually a11 parts of
the building but which must be turned in and' picked up at
the entrance each day - This arrangement was reluctantly
accepted but it was made clear at lunch and in later
discussion with the team and with Mr Anderson they are
unhappy with this slight infringement on their convenience
and physical access to the building_
6 Access: Of more concern was the Agency position
that the SATDOTO would serve as a control point for the
team S further access to individuals and documents in the
Directorate The requirement was explained in terms of the
need to record , against later requirements such as in fact
now in progress ste emming from another investigation
9
the
names , subject matter and general content of matters discussed
by Agency officers with team members The requirement to
'monitor was
explained
as an effort to keep this type of
record rather than to impose a third party from the office
of
SA/ D0/0
on a11 interviews; the latter was clearly
considered by the team to be an unreasonable intrusion . It
was agreed after some discussion that we would proceed with
SECPET
3
==================================================
Page 48
==================================================
13-00000
system outlined in the attached agenda and that we would
recons ider procedures later if seemed clearly to be
unwieldy _ We : ant elpated _ however that once the team
splits into smaller groups as is pianned , and pursues
particular areas of inquiry it will be possibie to evolve
a workable system which meets the objectives. of both parties .
7 Other: There appears to be no difficulty in
protecting identities of sources , providing documents in
sanitized form" ma intaining notes only in this building and
at the appropriate security level and' introducing some
officers under cover in alias where necessary al1 these
points were noted and none was objected to Space and
other facilities may be cramped but it appears to be possible
to provide adequate space adjacent to the SA/DQ/0 offices
Mr Anderson began by not the outstanding cooperation on
the Angola and COMINT surveys done in the building (in which
relatively free access to personnel and files had been
afforded his team) and ended by stating that the coming
survey was not a
witch
hunt nor an investigation of abuses
and that therefore he believed that such access could have
very beneficial results fo r the Agency _ It was agreed to
begin the survey formally with a
briefing by the DDO or
ADDO on 3 or 4 August 1976 _ Mr Walters with several team
members will however, set up shop on 2 August to review
such general briefing papers
as
Mr , Fendig can make
available to them at that time _
(signea)
Philip F. Fendig.
Philip F Fendig
SA/DO/0:PFFendig:j1 (7368/1398)
Distribution: (al1 w/att)
Orig 8 1 DDO
ADDO
OLC (Mr Miller)
D/ SEC (Mr Gambino)
1
SGAPDDOMr Point)
SA/ DDCI (Mr Bolten)
SA/ D0/0
E2 IMPDFT SKBEET
CL BY 012860
they
ing
==================================================
Page 49
==================================================
13-00000
SEc E7
AGENDA FOR MEETING WITH
HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMITTEE STAFF:
30 JULY 1976
[ntzla
A Request statement from Committee representatives of
scope duration and proposed procedure to be
followed_by Committee investigators
B , Discussion of arrangements for investigation:
1_ Facilities DDO will provide office space,
telephones and secure storage facilities for
investigators Parking Spaces and cafeteria
priveleges will also be provided
2 _ Security:
a _
Badges allowing unescorted access to
Headquarters building Will be issued
9
to be picked up and left with
receptionist. Agreement to be signed
when badge issued per current
procedures governing a11 Congressional
staffs
b Clearances through necessary level to
be obtained prior to commencenent of
briefings or interviews level to be
determined on basis of first meet ing _
3 _ Access:
a _
Orientation briefings
on Directorate
and its subdivisions to be offered .
b Access to personnel and docuents within
Agency to De controlled by_Qffice_of
SALDOOL which will maintain record of
a11 interviews and of documents provided .
Documents to be provided upon specific
request for study_ within_building_
will be sanitized to protect_ sources
and methods using_gudelines_previously
established for HSC and SSC
They
==================================================
Page 50
==================================================
13-00000
d_ Documents to be examined_by_the
investigation team within Headquarters
building- If copies of documents are
des ired . inves tigators will request
them from SA/ DO/0 who will see that
they are provided_promptly in
appropriate cTassified and sanitized
form If required by the Committee
(outside Headquarters building)
same
procedure will be followed but will
be subject to review by SA/ DO/0 _
Formal questions are to be put in
writing in order to provide proper
and full context S0 that most
complete and pertinent answers can
be provided _
f SA/DO/0 to monitor al1 interviews _
g . Discussion of note-taking and reports :
(1) Maintenance of proper_Security
and classification
(2) Notes to retain sane level 0f
security @Tassification as
documents or interviews on which
they based
==================================================
Page 51
==================================================
13-00000
ADMIC STRATIVE-INTERNAL USE ONI
This notice_expires 31 Jenuary 1978
DON 5-218
DD NOTICE GENERAL
NO. 5-218 August
SURVEY BY MEMBERS OF
TE HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMITTEE STAFF
1. GENERAL
Members of the staff of the House Approprietions Com-
mittee began an extensive examination of the Directo
rate of Operations beginning the week of 2 August 1976.
They expect that it will teke approximately 17 months
to complete this study - They stete their ectivities
are necessary to better uderstand the eppropriations
process _ They emphasize that their objective is not
to dig out evidence of wrongdoing or improper activi-
ties. The steff members activities will be coordi-
nated through SA/w/o. The following paragrephs
attempt anticipate the procedures necessary to
exercise orderly control over the staff'8 activities .
These ` procedures may be swbject to modi ficetion as
future experience may dictete_
2 _ LOCATION
Members of this Congressionel staff heve been issued
I1 blue badges bearing the words Comittee" which
permit uescorted access to all non-specielly controlled
areas of the buile including the main cafeterie_
The staff will be. provided suitable vate office
space in Room 2 D 0117, adjacent to the office of the
SA/bo/0 , which will be reloceted in Room 2 D 0109 8
of 6 August 1976. It 18 expected that they will initi-
elly heve a greater interest in interviewb then they
do in documents _ Since they will have adequate office
space interviews shoula be conducted within their
premises .
3. CONTROL OF DOCUMEWTS
a, The staff i9 'expected to make any requests for
documentetion to the SA/Do/o. Indivi dual officerg
ADMINISTRATIVE-INTERNAL; USE ONLY
1976
to
"House
ding,
pri-
==================================================
Page 52
==================================================
13-00000
ADMINTRATIVE-INTERNAL USE ONLY
DON 5-218
DDO NOTICEE GENERAL
NO _ 5-218 August 1976
who receive requests from steff members for docu-
ments should ask that the request be to the
SA/po/o_ All docuents provided to the SA/o/o
for trensmittel to steff will be logged in by
the SA/0/ and logged back to the component after
the staff has completed its study . The SA/do/o
will not, as a matter of routine procedure, retein
a copy of the docuent concerned_
b Ail documents will be properly sanitized to protect
sources and methods The steff has indicated thet
it does not anticipate any need for such detail
and accepts the principle of sanitization_
questions concerning the degree of sanitizetion
should be referred to the SA/w/o_ Groud rules
for sanitizetion are similar to those applied
during the activities of the Select Committees _
General delines will be provided separately.
On receipt of a docuent back from the SA/b/
the recipient should indicate the date received,
and that it had been made available to the staff
The docuent should be retained by the recipient
in the form in which it wes provided to the staff
for possible further reference; the record copy
of the docuent should als0 reflect the fact that
a sanitized copy wes provided to the staff
further copies of docuents requested by the steff
will be made only by the office of the SA/m/o _
4_ INTERVIEWS
8. A representative from the office of the SA/Do/o
will not necesgarily be present during interviews .
All interviews shoula be requested by the staff
through the SA/m/o_ The SA/do/o will maintain
a record of the date of interview; the name of
the person interviewed, ard whom; the elias
if one is used; and the sujects discussed _ A
form will be provided to the interviewee to record
2
ADMINISTRATIVE-INTERNAL USE ONLY
put
the
Any
gui
Any
by
==================================================
Page 53
==================================================
13-00000
ADMIAETSTRATIVE-INTERNAL USE ONI v
DON 5-218
DDO NOTICE GENERAL
NO. 5-218 4 August 1976
the essentiel facts . He should retain one copy
for possible future reference and One copy should
be forwerded to the SA/po/o_
b_ It i8 recognized that the badge access and the
length of the btey in the building by the btaff
members mey lead to wscheduled contacts . If
such contacts are connected with the officiel
duties of the staff, then appropriete comments
should be forwarded to SA/w/o on the form cited
above Officers should be careful not to ellow
conversations to drift to area8 of interest not
covered by official interviews If this does take
place_ however, we shall rely on the officer
concerned to inform the SA/po/o of these develop-
ments _
5 . SECURITY
The blue badge should be sufficient to indicate that
steff members should be treated 08 visitors in the
presence of persons not connected with their officiel
duties _ Persons introduced uder alias should be
careful that the alias i8, protected if 8 chance
meeting takes plece in the presence of other col-
leagues _ In this connection , persons interviewed
should be careful not to expose essociates who have
not been interviewed.
William W. Wells
Deputy Director for Operations
a/dbci
(mu. &e~) 76
27 `
3
ADMINISTRATIVE-INTERNAL USE ONLY
18Qus
==================================================
Page 54
==================================================
13-00000
CONFIDENTIAL
27 August 1976
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chiefs of Divis ions and Staffs
FROM Philip F. Fendig
SA/DO/ 0
SUBJECT Guidance for Interviews with House
Appropriations Committee Staff
REFERENCE DON 5-218 _
)
4 August 1976
1 . You have been scheduled at the time indicated on
the cover sheet of this memorandum for a
briefing to be
given to the five members of the Surveys and Investigations
Staff team from the House Appropriations Committee_ The
subjects which the team would like You to cover are contained
in the memorandum distributed prior to the DDO staff meeting
on 25 , August 1976 and discussed at that meeting _ I have
explained_ to the Surveys and Investigations team that topic e
(personnel policy and practices) wili be discussed at a
separate briefing to be given by the Chief Career Management
Group _ You should touch on the other topics suggested in the
memorandum mentioned above
2 _ General guidelines are; contained in reference
notice The following may be helpful , however in preparing
Your briefing_ Our general intention is to be a5 forth-
coming
a5 possible while drawing the line clearly at any
information which would lead to the identification of a
specific source intelligence method person or
group
With which the, Agency_ has a
ceiaEGOR;hipio
of confidence ,
or confidential matter involving
a cooperating foreign
intelligence service The fact of liaison with foreign
services can in most cases be acknowledged but details of
the relationship and the subject matter of joint or shared
operations should not be disclosed .
3 _ In the briefing contemplated
on
management policies
and practices most of the above sensitive areas would not
appear to arise, but You may find that questions will tend
to out some more sensitive areas and these should be aeferfed
with an agreement of looking into the possibility of:
providing further information later The staff has already
had access to basic budgetary material, including funds and
CONFIDENTIAL
==================================================
Page 55
==================================================
13-00000
CuialVeIWIIAL
personnel strengths broken down by component and a
listing
by cryptonyms and fund levels of
ali OPACTS
They have
been given
a
briefing on the current organization of the
Directorate of Operations and are aware that its staff
elements will shortly be reorganized . They have a
listing
of a11 overseas stations and bases If You have further
questions on material already provided to the Committee,
please check with this office
4 _ Most of the briefings
are scheduled to take place
in room 2 D if possible a member of my staff will be
present - We
Owouia fppcecibte
however a short Memorandum
for the Record, using the attached "Interview Form" as a
general guide_ Space is somewhat limited_ but you should
bring any: personnel You desire to have participate
in your
"E,i4PRSEting-
The Surveys and Investigations team is
aware that aliases may be used by those with solid cover
status; please advise this office if any persons intend to
use an alias during these briefing sessions
5 _ We will be, happy to assist in any way ,
including
follow-up matters which may be developed in the course of
these briefings
8
Philip Fendig
att
E2 IMPDET
CL BY 012860 CONFIDENTIAL
ing
==================================================
Page 56
==================================================
13-00000
044
August 18 , 1976
MEMORANDUM FORa Mr Philip F Fendig
SA/DO/0
FROM L M. Walters Staff Member
House
AppropSiations
Committee
Surveys and" Investigations Staff
Request arrangement for comprehensive briefings with
appropriate officials regarding the subjects outlined below
be provided to HAC SG I Staff members George C . Baird and
Leon F Schwartz .
1 Paramilitary Covert Action Cadre
Provide in this briefing data relating to the
organization_ utilization and cost data for this activity
for the periods FY 74 75 76 and projected data for FY 77
and FY 78 Organizat
ionai
data should include manning and
equipment levels for the aforementioned periods
2 . Reorganization of the Directorate of Operations
Briefing should include rationale behind the proposed
reorganization and manpower and dollar savings to be effected
by such a change _ If additional expenditures in either
dollars or manpower: positions are involved iusGetifitiox
should accompany the presentation_ Explain detail how the
Directorate of Operations plans to absorb the FY 77 loss of
100 manpower positions: if imposed in the pending Appropriations
Bill.
3 The_Special Projects_Group
Explain the rationale behind the transfer 0f Israel
from the Near East Division and providing it with special
status by placing it directly under DDO _ Additional manpower
and dollar costs accompanying this change should be addressed ,
4 Coordination Within the_Intelligence_Community
Briefing should show the identity and purposes of the
various task groups established (both within CIA and community -
==================================================
Page 57
==================================================
13-00000
wide) which have been specifically established to deal with
the collection VS analysis problem _ Impacts and changes
brought about or anticipated within DO a5 a result of these
groups actdons should be' covered
5 Management Policies and Practices of Each DO Staff
and Division (a separate briefing by each) including but
not Timited to:
a
Overview of role of staff or division
b Decision-making processes and how coordinated
in DO, CIA and intelligence community
Organizational structure
d . Program. development and execution from
initiation to budget to implementation including
development of annual plans their flexibility, and degree
of autonomy of case officers chiefs of stations
)
desk
officers and division or
staff directors
Personnel policies and practices including
recruitment training promotion, position classification,
establishment of station complements and rotational policies .
f_ Management and accounting controls to assure
compliance with laws executive orders policies and
regulat ions and assurance that funds and other assets are
properly used expended and receipted for _
Wh ile the order of arranging the presentations is not
critical it is suggested that_
9
if possible, item (1.) be
presented earliest and that item (5,) be instituted the week
of 30 _ Please coordinate with either Mr Baird or
ayseli"so
for prompt scheduling of these sessions Also , it
would be appreciated if a copy 0f charts or other documentary
material used in thepresentations could be provided to the
attendees during each briefing session
Z
ing
==================================================
Page 58
==================================================
13-00000
BENDER WILL CHECK CLASBFICAH Top AND Bottom
UNCLA SSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL SECRET
OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP
To NAME AND Address DATE IniTiALs
MI Fe~dig
AcIOH DIRecT_ REPLY PREPARE REPLY
Approval dispatch RECOWMENDATION
COMMENT FILE RETURN
CoNcurrence InforMatvon SIenaturE
Remarko , Ustrio : To Soeuk, Sum
Fot Ynu wo J sur &Eckt06
6 Lw 1,7 2d/o 76-325) 7 26
mra 1916,
wra Uu A(dd0m [niln WUa
T1 Snodka Ajs
0
MB0 .
Gw Meluu 4
4
cen Ien &
DcI %9 alm %s Ils bmivbk
01
Ue
4rw nulcr ( m dL )
FOLD HERE To RETURN To SENDER
FROM: NAME, Addre3s ANO PHONE No_ Date
Walmlr
10 5n6
UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL SECRET
ForU WQ 237 Uso previous edilions (0)
1-67
==================================================
Page 59
==================================================
13-00000
S E C R E T
in attempting to be both 'thcoming and helpful to him and the
Committee in understanding the DDO' $ problems. At the same time
Mr . Snodgrass pointed out that while he had no quarrel with Mr _ Shackley,
he continued_to_be_irritated_with the totalitr_ef_the Agencys attitude toward
providing him with_data Mr Snodgras8 then launched into a litany
on how the Agency had not been responsive in terms of his needs as he
perceived them in the time frame_February _to May 1976 _ With that as a
backdrop Mr. Snodgrass then launched into his inquiry &s to the Agency
wa S not willing to him fullaccess_to _Management_by Objective docu-
ments - The dialogue Which followed on this topic had a natural ebb and
flow to it, but the key point that emerged from this is that Mr. Snodgrass
continues to feel that unless he can see the Management by Objective
documents he will not be able to have a firm_understanding_of _DDOman-
pewerallocation_procedures_ Secondly, Mr . Snodgrass claims that CIA's
position that it win show Management_by_Qbjective_documents_to member 5
of the Committee_and not the Staff is an obstructionist _tactic. His
that the members of the Committee do not havethe_time to look at
such documents and they thus depend on_theCommitteeStaff for this type
of substantive review According to Mr. Snodgrass this means that if the
Agency will not provide_data to the Staff, it is in fact denying_information
to the Committee members: Attempts were made by Mr_ Shackley to show
now men of good will on both sides of this question could have an honest
difference of opinion on the issue. In this framework Mr. Shackley re-
iterated the PDO position_that access to Management bY_Qbiective_docu-
ments Mr. Snodgras 6 would impact adversely_on_the_whole question 0f
sources andumethods as well as the _integrity of the reporting system As
a followup to this position an effort wa s made to find out exactly what it
wa s about the DDO manpower allocation system that Mr_ Snodgrass did
not understand and which he thought he might find out about from an
examination of the Management by Objective documents. It was hoped
that through this line of inquiry an alternate approach could be discovered
which would enable 68 to deal with Mr . Snodgrass problems . Our probes
in this direction were unsuccessful in clarifying the issue. One can
conclude that Mc_Snodgra 88 is committed to finding gome_sort of 2
formula Qr_equation which will enable him to test Qur_manpower allocation
syster We have repeatedly outlined to him the variable factors that &0
S E C R E T
for
long
why
give
point
being
by
only
==================================================
Page 60
==================================================
13-00000
S E C R E T
7
into making judgments on operational deployment of manpower guch as
wk t targets are in a country, what arethe_great_power_interests in a
particular country, what i6 the operational environment in the country
i. e. permissive or not, what are the cover pos Sibilities, what are Qur
liaison equities, and what are our needs for regiona] support from a
particular country. Thege explanations are taken aboard by Mr Snodgrass,
but he is looking for somethingelge which has less variables in it when,
in fact, there is no magic formula for determining how one gets people to
commit treason_ This portion of the meeting ultimately ended on a
friendly
note but left unresolved the question of what was it that Mr. Snodgrass
really wanted on the issue of manpower allocations and what could CIA tell
him that we haven't already told him: (ACTION REQUIRED: Mr . Snodgrass
is currently preoccupied with drafting his report on the House Appropria -
tions Committee Mark-up of the DDO FY 77 budget: Once this task is
completed Mr Chin, OLC, will return to see Mr. Snodgrass will try
to obtain an elaboration of what specifically are_the_manpower_issuesthat
trouble Mr:_Snodgrass. In this context Mr. Chin has been asked to try to
determine if a review, position-by-position 0f two or three_typical Stations
within the_ DDO mieht_give Mr. Snodgra ss the insight into manpower
cations that he is currently Beeking.
9 _ Comment. In net 2sse8sment terms one would have to conclude
that the 25 meeting achieved the optimum that could be expected from
this kind of an encouter_ On the one hand the attached briefing book which
wa$ examined by Mr. Snodgrass wa & accepted by the latter as a first rate
product. For this the A gency high marks_ On the other hand, the
Management by Objective sybtem, because he can't see the documents
leaves Mr. Snodgrassfrustrated and irritated_ This evokes acrimonious
complaints from Mr. Snodgra8s with the end result being that the_burden
for seeking a solution to a problem created by Mr . Snodgrass is placed @np
the Agency: In short, we have ended up where we expected to be _ Put
another way ,_ there appears_to_be_no_progpect for establishing_the_type %
dialogue with Mr. Snodgrass_whichsa tisfies eiterests 0f both parties.
we @e inexitahky doomed to bejng in an adversary relationshie wih
although it is incumbent on 48 to continue to minimize to the extent that
S E C RE T
and
allo-
May
gets
him
==================================================
Page 61
==================================================
13-0
MBO
Mr . Mahon . Would you please provide the Comittee staff with
some samples of these performance reports, sanitized as you think
appropriate?
Mr _ Bush . I would be willing to bring some down and discuss them with
the Comittee off the recora, Mc Chairman_ But I am reluctant to do that,
and I am even more reluctant to provide the docuents_themselves or to have
their contents described to the Comittee bY anyone Who is not intimately
familiar with espionage counterintelligence and covert action operations
and with the entire managenent system used by the Operations Directorate_
There are a number Of reasons for mYposition_ One serious concern
revolves around; the effects on our internal processes of the sort of inquiry
you propose_ One of the primary reasons that our internal' management system
is effective is that participation is strictly Limited to_thoge_imediately
concernea_ Given that we are all hunan beings _ there is no escaping the
fact that knowledge that the reports in question are being read, or at
some future time be read, by outsiders will lead to their _being Witten
with a view to their possible impact on an extended readership_ There will
be a tendency for the managers in the Eield to slant_their discussions of
problems_and_to_exaggerate accomplishments Inevitably the net effect
will be' to reduce the usefulness of the system:
Another difficulty involves security_ To be useful for judging per-
formance
2
the reports must be very detailed Thus discuss recruitments
in terms 'of nubers the specific ccess Of agents to_information; recruit-
ment techniquest and so forth. By the time all .this sensitive material On
sources and methads is removed, any samples are going to consist primar=
oE disconnected bits and pieces or of 'unenlightening generalizations_
And I have a third problem with this request. The reports thenselves
are but one part of a very complex &nd thorough process we use for internal
management _ It takes a detailed_familiarity with_the_process_to appreciate
its effectiveness Thus I feel strongly that someone Erom the Agency who
has that intimate knowledge should be present if and when want to
consider the reports.
X
Fb Jx
Oel
may
they
ily
you
~iT>
Dcz Bust mo1 y
TESTi Mt"tia
Hawe