Transcript of 104-10330-10083.pdf
==================================================
Page 1
==================================================
a0 T @0410330 10083]
2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F_ KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992
APR 15 '97 04:SSPM USGOVERNMENT
P.2/14
SECRET
Ccnbal Intelllgetkar Agigy
WahteMO C ZOsOS
15 April 1997
MEMORANDUM FOR: Davia G_ Marwell
Bxecutive Director
Ageagglnatlon Recorde Revlew Boara
SUBJECT : CIA Employee8
(We requebt chat thia memorandum be returned to CIA
once the Review Board hag completed ite dellberatione on the
Jabue8 diacusged below )
1 (U) Ieeue. The purpobe of thla memo 1s to relate
CIA 0 concerng to the Revlew Board regarding tne release oE
the true namea Of CIA employees that appear in the JFK
Collection and to present a propogal on how thia problem
might be addregged .
I,Zactuel Rackaround
2 (U) To date approximately 600 true names Of CIA
employeee have been Ldentifled in the JFR Collection_ gome
of thege employees are important to the JFK @tory and CIA
will contInue to work wlth the Revlew Boaxd to
reiease
a8
many Of thege nameg a8 poebible_ nanes however_
appear only a few timeg Jn the entire JFK
Coilection
and
appear to add nothing to the hlatorical recora_
3 (U) Under guidelineg adopted by the Revlew Board
on or about 20 March 1996 any nameg Of CIA employeee are
pregumptively releaged
uniese
CIA provldea gpeclfic evldence
to the Review Boara that harm co the national gecurity or to
the employee would 1ikely result from guch release _ gince
cheee guidelines were adopted , It hab become increagingly
clear that the number of namea at iague_ and , In mogt cage8 ,
their tenuoug connection to the JFK story, make thie
approach unworkable with regard co both CIA 8 OblLgation to
CL BY : 2224130
CL REASON : I.s()
DECL ON ; X1
DRV FROM: HUM 4 - 82
SECRET
Many
==================================================
Page 2
==================================================
13-
ApR 15 '97 04:S5PM USGOMVERMMENT P.3/14
SECRET
Subject : CIA Employeee
protect natlonal security informatlon and the Revlew Board' s
$ auty to Inform the public about the JFR aaga8gntlon In a
tImely and accurate faghlon_ The cagk Of locating and
Informlng hundreds Of former employeee scattered all over
the country and the world hab been a formldable One Some
have contacted ue to repart their concernb about a
eauzoyeeous
" 0 letter purportIng co be from CIA which they had
recelved. It would not be burpriging, therefore , if many
former employeee Ignored the letter Eor GimLlar reabong
even though they might have legitImate neede to procect
thelr identieiee
4 (U) Contacting every named employee and collecting
information On each of them to pregent to the Review Board
will clearly take more eime and effort than Of ub had
anticipatea. This 'will have obvloug
tanhzicatYoo:
for how
and when: che Revlew Board releabeb Information to the
public. More importantly, the decialon to publicly
acknowiedge employees who may have been lLving for over 30
yeare under cover 18 a critical one that Bhould be made not
by default but rather by careful planning and
Consideration_
5 _ (U) Relevant to thig dlecubalon 18 the fact that
the Revlew Boara and CIA have recently agreed upon a policy
for releaging
true namea Of sourcee Of Intelligence
informatlon- It wae agreed at that time that there would be
a pregumptIon Of protecting Bource name8 ; but In cabe8 where
a 8ouxce wag particularly Important to the JEK gtory and
there was no overriding natlonal gecurity Interest_
1
the name
woula be released: Although the CIA recognIzee that there
are BOme bengltlvltles Lnvolved wlth 8ourceg that do not
apply to covert there are albo many legal and
operatlonal
ezuezployees,
whlch are degcrlbed heretn, that
justify gimilar treatment by the Revlew Board. Ae 10
further detallea in gection IV _ CIA, therefore_ proposee
that the Revlew Board adopt a
general policy of protecting
employee names that In_the, Collection, wlth
exceptlona for those
appdividuala
whom the Board belleve8 are
Important to the JFK atory_
II Legal ConglderatLona
6 (U) As both covert CIA employeee and clandestine
reporcing asbeta are cypeg Of m human bourcee" of
intelligence , many Of the 8ame lawg apply_ Although Sectlon
11(a) of the JFK Act providee that when the Act reguires
release of informatlon It takeg precedence over all other
lawe that would otherwiee prohibit releage_ there are strong
governmental natlonal gecurity interebtb: in protecting the
true named of CIA employees _ CIA bellevee that it 18
2
SECRET
==================================================
Page 3
==================================================
13-O0000
'AFr 15 '97 04:S6PM USGOVERNMENT
P.4/14
gECRET
8ubject : CIA Employeeg
important for the Revlew Boara to reconaider the lawg whlch
protect clasgified Inforatlon , becaube they clearly reflect
a larger US Government policy to protect covert CIA
employees Erom dlaclosure _
7 _ (U) By Executlve order and statute, the Pregldent
and Congreas have made the Director Of Central Intelligence
reeponeible for proteccing Bourcee OE intelligence In hie
Directlve Of 22 January 1946 that eatablighed the Central
feteoudfencefOropro Preeldent Truman made the DCI
rebpons_ for protecting bourceb WIth the ebtabllehment
Of CIA, Congreee algo gave the DCT thig regponeIbility: Tne
National Security Act Of 1947 _ Section 103 (a) (3) Codified
at 50: USC 5403 (3) (C) (5) requires the DCI to protact
Intelligence
aourcea from unauthorlzed dLeclobure. In
addition, S403 (3) (a) (2) regulres the DCI co eneure that
risks to the Unltea gtates and thoge involved in the
collection Of Intelligence through human bources are
minimlzed _
8 _ (U) Protecting the identity OE individuals worklng
for CIA, not only covertly but overtiy a8 well_ hae been Of
partlcular concern to US lawakere 0Ince the eatablighment
Of the' Agency_ For example_ with gectlon 6 Of the Central
Intelllgence Agency Act Of
i949,
50 USC S403g, Congreae
epeclfically exempted the CIA Erom the provlelong of any law
requiring the publication
or alacloaure Of the organizatlon,
functione _ namee titlee , galarle8 _
1 or numbera of perbonnel
employed by the Agency .
9 (U) In 1980 , Congreae pagged the Clasgifled
Information Procedures Act (CIPA) which 8ete out pretrlal
trial and appellate procedures for crimlnal cabe8
involving
or
pocentlally Involving clabelfled Information _ working
with the Department Of Juatlce and the cource, CIA hag
buccegefully protected the names Of CIA employeeb from
public releabe even In criminal trlale where there are
helghtened (i.e_ congtitutional) conslderatlong favoring
digclogure Eo the defendant Of all government Information
relevant to the defenge_ CIPA allowg for 1n camera ex parte
hearingg Jn which the judge can rule On queatlons Of
admlagibillty and relevancy Of clagsified Information,
Including the Identity Of CIA employeee who have
Informatlon pertalning to the defenae_ before
ealt
18
introduced either to Ehe defendant_ defenge counbel _ or in
open court In 80me cage8 Involving CIA, the Judge nae
ordered that CIA inforation be turned over to the defenge
but only In sgome unclagelfled form buch a0 Ln" a eummary- In
other cabee Judgee have revlewed the claggi_ied Information
and rulea that the harm to national securlty outwelghe the
3
SECRET
==================================================
Page 4
==================================================
13-O00O0
APR 15 '97 0A:S8PM1 USGOVERNIENT P.5/14
SECRET
Subject: CIA Employeeg
defendant 8 legal rlghte to che Information _ In 8t1ll other,
cabee the defenae wae never notifled that CIA even had
Intormatlon bearing On the cabe a8 the Judge ruled that the
mere fact that CIA posaessed thig informatlon was claaslfied
and outwelghed any righte the defendant had . Moreover_
under CIPA, the Attorney General hag the authority to drop a
progecutlon In thobe Cabea where the risk to national
Jecurity L0 too great .
10 _ (0) In 1982 Congreee agaln acted to protect CIA
employeeg by pa8Bing the Intelligence Identities Protection
Act O2 1982 , 50 USC" 5421 that Criminalizeg the revelation Of
a covert employee or the identity of a aource_ This act
aubjecte anyone who reveals Information that Identlfles a
"covert agent 4 to progecution and provldes up_ to 10 yearg in
prleon and $50, 000 In fineb: a8 punlghment_ Thla act
epecifically defineb a "covert agent" a8 including "an
OEflcer or employee Of an intelligence agency A
11_ (U) Most recently , Prealdent ClInton 8igned
Executive.Order 12958 On- claselfied national gecurity
Information that became effective in October 1995 _ Although
It requiree generally that agenclea make greater
declasslflcation effortb than under the prlor executive
oxder_ Executive Order 12958 afforde human Bourceb Of inteliigeece ineoiraeioz;
which would Include employeee ,
extra protection from the declabelflcation provibione
Under B.0_ 12958_ Information that i8 over 25 yeare old and baving hiatoricai
value muat be declaggified wlthin Elve
yeare_ However_ information revealing the Identity of a
human source may contInue to be protectea.
12 (O) The above federal laws ghow a long-gtanding
practice the US Government to protect CIA employees Erom
alaclosure to the public_ In carrying out Itb Btatutory
Obligations the Revlew Board Bhould gIve gerloug weighe to
thla polIcy and afford the protection of CIA employeea a
nigh' priority.
III,Qperatdonal Congfderatlone
13 (O) For current CIA employeeb whose names may
appear In the JFK Collectlon, the operatlonal conalderatlons
for protectIng thelr Identity are gimilar to thoae for
aources _ Many of thege 'employeea have worked #under coveri
for CIA Cover 18 uged to dleaggoclate entire installationg
and office8 from open IInkage to intelligence actIvitles _ to
enable Intelligence pereonnel to enter and work effectively
in foreign countriee to shield Agency employeee and
authorlged clandestine activleles Erom attention by hoatile
elements and from media expogure, to facllltate acce8b to
SECRET
by
==================================================
Page 5
==================================================
13-00000
'APR 15 '97 04:S9PM USGOVERNMENT P.6/14
SECRET
gubject : CIA Employeee
certaln Indlvlduale OE Intelllgence intereet _ to prevent;
embarragament to hoet_forelgn governmente and to permit
plauelble denlal Of CIA' 8 preeence and activItlee in forelgn
countrleb _
14 - (0) The abflIty to maintaln one 0 cover 18
cruclal to gatherlng intelligence_ In elther a "hoatile" or
"frlendly" country_ bhoula the local 8axvlce became aware Of
who the CIA employeee are Jt woula Increage burvelllance
and make untlateral
operetions
dlfficult Lf not impogalble _
In Bome countriee _ the local government tolerates the CIA
pregence and agreee to work Wleh 48 28 long ab the local
population Le not aware Of the circumstanceg Once It
becomes know among the locale that certaln Ug Government
officlale are actually CIA, pregeure may be on the
government to those Amerlcans digrupting liaLeon and
diplomatic
t8lec2enstk88
More importantly, covert
employeee and chelr
famiiieg
woula Eace Increaged riek to
their pergonal Bafety. Even In M frlendly" countrles _ our
employeee could face s0me peraonal riekb a0 well 88 rlekb to
ongolng operatione Erom extremieta who may be llving among
an ocherwlae benign local population_ In any of thebe
cabeb_ ghould a covert employee 8 cover be publicly
compromleed_ that employee may have to be recalled Exom the
fleid; and It could be dlfficult to place him elaewhere in
an operatLonally and phyeically aecure location Thue ,
maintalning
cover 18 important to a case Officer' 8
effectiveneeg and to the continuation of a career wIth CIA_
15 . (S) Maintaining the confldentlality Of cover i0
albo Important to cover provlder8 _ The Review Board w1ll
recall from prior brlefings by the Agency that covert CIA
employeee _ both Ln the Unlted statea and overbea8 can work
under "officlal" Je-94 (Eate Department) cover or "non -
offIclal" (0.g_ Crvace company cover Dlaclogure Of a
covert employee Woula not ,only be Official acknowledgment Of
the specific cover mechanigm employed by CIA but would albo
negatlvely affect the governmental or businegg mlaalon' 0f
the cover provider_ ebpeclally thoge who provlde non-
officlel cover Acknowledgment of an employee who had been
under non-OffIclal cover in a hogt country and poBB In
other countries could have a negatlve impact On the
provrder 8 puoineza Intereste and activitlea It would al8o
cast Guaplcion on Ehat provIder 6 TegHEimatg employees and
their familles_ Further , exposure Of cover providere could
affect the recrultment and cooperation Of euch providers by
the Agency ana Intelligence Community-
16_ (S) Although the majorlty Of nameb that appear Ln
the Collection
are retired CIA employeea_ the operational
congideratlons In revealing their affillation wIth CIA are
5
SECRET
placed
1bly
==================================================
Page 6
==================================================
13-00000
APR 15 '97 05:OQPM USGOVERNMENT P.7/14
SECRET
Subject: CIA Employees
not diminished _ Similar to bource8 many former employeee
eclll do not want their pagt affiliatlon with CIA revealed.
Perhape thelr current friendg . family, or employere are not
aware of thie paet affillation; and revelatlon Of that fact
could negatively affect peraonal and profesgional
relationghipg Some former employees gtlll live overbeae
where a revelation Of CIA affiiiatlon pogee rlake to their
personal eafety_ Other former employeeg travel overaeas on
buaine8g_ where a revelation of a pagt CIA affiliation can
threaten thelr busine8g Interegte and pereonal gafety_
One example of an employee in thig category 1s Robert
Eulton whoge name apparently appear8 only once in the
Collection_ Fulton retired under CDepartment 8f State} cover;
he currently hab a consultant bualnege and_ frequently
travele to (China} Releaee of hie name would Jeopardize not
hig bueine8& but perhape even hie bafety A_elmllar
example 18 (Walter_McCabe who algo retired under state_
cover He l0 now working Jn Russia and several Eagty
Eurepean countrieg for a prlvate EIrm_ He does not want hls
name publ1bhed, becauge it coul be damagIng to hle current
employer and hig professional etatus
17 _ (S) Even if a former employee agrees to the
revelation of hls name in the JFK Collection, chle mght not
be posgible for other reagone In 8ome cabes _ officially
acknowledgLng a covert employee could threaten ongolng
operations on whlch that employee worked _ Foreign natlonalg
recrulted by the employee and Still providing Information to
the US Government woula be at risk of exposure Publlc
acknowledgment could reveal the location of CIA btationg
where the employee worked throughout hs career Including
8ome not releaaed by the Revlew Boaxd _ Any individuale who
had substantial contact with a former employee overbeab and
may have belLeved they were legitlmately providing
information to a US corporate reprebentatlve would be upset
Lo learn they were, Ln fact, aiding the US Government
18 (U) Einally, the identlfication of case officers
by thelr Own service would have a chilling effect on
progpective aabets Progpectlve ag8ete would be unl ikely to
enter Into a clandestine relationehip with Amerlcan
intelligence 1f they believe that CIA doeb not protect even
ita Own ataff employeee from public dleclosure
IY Propogal
19 (U) In 1ight Of the foregolng , CIA belleves it 18
important to work toward a general policy Of protecting CIA
employees identlfled in the JFK Collection, with exceptiong
made for those individuala who are Lmportant to the story of
the asgas8ination_ The Agency proposes that in mogt case8 a
SECRET
only
==================================================
Page 7
==================================================
13-O0000
"APR 15 '97 OS:O1PM USGOVERNMENT P.8/14
SECRET
Subject : CIA Employees
subetltution for the true name be ueed . If the Revlew Board
18 concernea about tracking particular employees throughout
che recorde_ a particular identifying bubatitution can be
ugea for a particular employee _
20 _ (S) CIA belLeveg that thfe approach W1li not
undermine the Revlew Board '8. obllgatlons under the JFX Act _
A revlew OE the JFK Collection reveale that approxlmately 84
Of the 600 name8 appeax only once in the entire Collection_
In such cabea lt 10 difficult to bee how the Indivlduals
identity can add anything Of gignificance to che hlgtorical
record; there may be Bome aecurity concerng: 8til1
aggoclated with: thege individualg _ For example_ Arthur H
StImgon retirea under cover and 18 currently living In
Burope_ When the CIA notlfled him that hig name appeared in
the JFK Collectlon and wae eubject to public releabe_ he
cold CIA that be wab oppoged to having hig name releaged and
belleved Buch a releage could poee peraonal and eecurity
problemg _ Furthermore _ he could not underetand why hie name
even appeared In the Collectlon_ a1nce he had no
recollection of being involved in anything related to the
ageaboination_
21 _ (9) WIth regard to the approximately 500 nameg
that appear more than once In the Collection the vast
maJority Of theee individuale played almoat no role In the
JEK_gtory Oe example of thla 18 former DO officer
Alexander Braeko Hig name appeare approxlmately 20-30
times In the Collectlon_@lmply becauae he 8igned off on name
trace requeete Mx Bragko wag a covert CIA employee and:
retired under cover The public releage of hie name would
provtde the public with no addllonal 9lgnificant
Informatlon about JFK _ Tom Flores ie another example Of a
covert CIA employee whoge name appears in the CqLlection but
hag' little or no connectlon to the JFK story_ Floree
retlred under cover 10 llving In South America and Objects
to the releage OE
hig
name Mx Floreg recent letter to
CIA 18 albo attached for your convenience _
22 (S) The Agency , Of courge_ recognizee that 8ome
namea may be particularly important: to the JFK atory
regardlees Of how frequently or Infrequently they appear in
the Collection_ One Buch example 18 former Cog Mexico
WInbton Scott who CIA hae acknowledged ag a CIA employee_
In &uch cabee the CIA will continue Co work wlth the Revlew
Board for an appropriate regolution The CIA propobea that
the Review Board and lts etaff identify thobe inaividuale
whom It belleveg are Important to the JFK story and whoge
nameb Bhould be releaged to the public _ Thege nameb would
Carry a presumptton of releabe unle8s specific evidence 18
provided to the Revlew Board that har wou_a likely result
11
SECRET
Yet
==================================================
Page 8
==================================================
13-00000
APR 15 '97 OS:@2PM USGOVERNMENT P.914
SECRET
Subject: CTA Employeee
from guch releage _ The CIA will conduct the approprlate
eearchee to deterlne whether releabe would pobe national
becurity concernb for the US Government or pexsonal
concerna for the Lndivldual: In thla CIA and the
eaRetlev
Boara can concentrate their efforts On
raluafvidunde
who are
gignlficant figures In cbe JFK btory , expediting the review
of the Bequestered collectLon _
23 (U) Ic 1e Qur: hope that the' CIA and the Revtew
Board can agree On and work out a
mutually acceptable policy
regarding the identity Of CIA employees that wiil not
undermine the Important prInclple of protecting thoge who
work covertly for the US Government _ My staff and I are
ready to dibcuee thls matter with you at your convenlence _
nae J_ OTNeil
Act ng_General Coungel
Attachment
A [Tenrploraeu letter
8
SECRET
==================================================
Page 9
==================================================
13-00000
APR 15 '97 05:Q3PM USGOVERNMENT P.10/14
SECRET
gubject: CIA Employeee
DCI/OGC/ LDKEC@ pzzand 76124 (10 Apr 97)
OGC-97-50971
Diatributlon:
Original Aadreagee
GC
Llt FIle LDGO0021
1
RSC S1grer
OGC Regietry
9
SECRET
==================================================
Page 10
==================================================
13-00000
APR 15 '97 05:03PM' USGOVEERNENT P.11/14 4
P,2
17 Meroh 1997
Ms. Beth Millo
Deer Ms, Mills,
Your letter of 4 Marah was delivered to me on 10 Merch, &nd this reply will
be sent vie the gate ohannol
Iwieh to go on rocord as demanding that my name not be reloased in ANY
document disclosed corceraing the Kendedy assaggination,
Firet, I ahall dogcrlbe my pregent ciroumstanceg; and thereafter I wll addrogs
the legal polnts in the legislation,
Iretirod in
1974 {n e clandeetine statug, using & State Dopartment oover,
which has worked reasonebly well since then Iregide In Caracas, Vebezuola Thie
city (and_tho entiro oounty) is gtill populatad with Communigts and ex-Communists
wtio formed part of the Marxiat conspiraoy to overthrow the demooratically elected
Govemments in the ,19604 &nd 708. Meny of these persons are.DOw members of
Congress and a few are in the Presidents Cabinet; During my gervlce In Venezuola,
as COS;, I maintained liaison with civilian and military oficers, during which time I
worked . with thage ta overcome the guenilla ofifensive, - and to cotbat the
Communist Party after ii acoepted "paoification; " I Jeft in 1972 &d wont to
Vietem, from whloh I tetured t Venezuola %s & private oltizen Becauso of my
wifels employment ` and friendships, we aro as olosely connected wlt the
Jewiah Community &s two Christiens can be.
Given my gomewhat exposed posltion a9 COS, my tnle affiliation was known
to & numnber of important Venezuelan dovemment officials. In any evont; soon after
my return; I wes informed by the Venezuelad Govornment that en Important
Communist leader bad loarned of my roturn, ad that "I was Mving in Urbanlzaoion
Miranda (a small and gomewhat isolated Ceracas guburb) and that I was training
right wing paramilitary personnel;' (t were rght about where I lved, but
Ukl
long
They
==================================================
Page 11
==================================================
13-00000
P.12/14_
APR 15 '97 O5:A4PM USGOVERNEENT
P.3
tonfused Boy Scouts with "right wing paremilitary personhel: " I worked 88 a
volunteer leader for the Scouts Qf America and the Venczuelen Scout
Association from 1974 t0 about 1991,
In any event; the Vobezuolad Govemment was eufficiently concerned ebout
tbe matter, that it offered me & group of bodyguards. I tured down the offer, &nd
esked them to provide me with a. automatlo pistol for my protection I ati bave
thet piatol,
The county hag changed somewhat since that time. There are still & number
of underground redical groupe Who resisted pacification, and ty to foment violenoe
wherever poggible. Along the Colombiad border they eppear to be linked up with
tho Colotbian ELN and: FARC. In addition to these, the cuntry has been
iniltrated by redioal Moglem movemlents A Cuban Embassy, with: its usuel
colleotion of intelligenoe officers, is looatod in Caraceg Further Iraq &d
Lebanon also maintain diplomatic bere; and probably support tha Muglim
extremists;
Under present circumetanoes, my cover hag prevonted mo from coming to the
attentlon of these people. However, I feel vory strongly that if name is released,
I will bocome 8 potentlel target for thebe and other porgons who wish to
ombarrass the Unlted States: endlor edvergely affect U.S Nenezuelan relationghips.
I wes recently decorated by the Venazuelan Pregident for my contributions to good
Venozueler/American rolationa.
I heve no intentlon of 'leevlng Venezuela under any ciroumstanoo8 .
Any connection I may ever have had with tho investigation of President
Kennedys assa8gination, was hlghly peripheral, Any doouments which may b0
released, could iuclude my Job title (rathor than my name) without reduoing the
valuc of gaid documents,
Since I will be quite dead in 2S years, I cannot object to my uame being
Boy
Iran,
posts
my
egain
==================================================
Page 12
==================================================
13-00000
MXPR 15,'97,9506841 USGOVERNMENT 13/14
P
roloased at that time.
Although dot mentioned &8 &n option in your letter; I would like to be
permitted to revew the doouments oontaining my name which you are belng obliged
to release. Whon I retired, I gave up ell Inks with fror gourcos. One of thege
popped up in the Now York Tlnes last week Some Others 8till bo alive, &nd in
need of protection, although es [ tecall, none had aty ugeful data concerning tha
asgassination, If &he sources aro to be exposed, I feel very gtrongly that are
entitled to eJl the protection we' can afford them; Iwl be in the Washington D.C,
erea in November 1997, and would be willing to review these documents
In termg of the provieiona you clte for exceptiong in your letter, (A) I consider
mygelf & person (Agent?) Whoge identity ourrently requires protection
The cover [ am using, provided by the State Departmenf; ig (B) en
intelligenca mothod whiob is curontly utilizod ,
Tha disolosre 0f my name &9 part of the assassination reoord (C.3)
could reasonably be.expeoted to constitute &n unwerranted juvasion of pergonal
privacy, &nd that invaslon,is so subatantial thet it outweigha the public interest; I
cannot regist defining_tho public interest in this matter a8 "public morbid curiogity."
The publio dieclosure of my name a8 part of the assagsinatlon record (C,4)
would probably cotlpromise the: exlstence of an1: understandlng of confidentiality
currently requiring' 'protootion: between
a
goverment' agent `and
a
cooporating
individual or foreign goyerument, and public disclosure would be s0 hermful tat It
outweighs te public' interest, I wae COS In Bollvle when the essassination
OccuTed, Iwas in close touch with the Bolivian Govemment gecurity chief &t that
and with the Mlnlster of Interior, &d we probably Interchanged data O the
murder, although oould provide nothing ugeful, tha Stetion wag probably
tasked to query ell of our gources' On te matter; again with negative regults; The
rovelation of my name &nd tha Identitles of Iaison oontacts and unilateral gources
would not only imperil me, but would also etbarrags the Bolivian Government, and
s
may
thoy
public
time,
they Also,
==================================================
Page 13
==================================================
13-00000
'tK 42 _ 36. J0PtI1 USUUVERNIIENI
could endanger curreut &ctivities of &he Agency In that county. I do not recall
whether in my subsequent. esgignmont %s Chiof of the Cuban Tagk Force, eny
mention of the assas9ination came Up. However; if it did, revelatlon of my name
could not only imporil 'those agonte of the time Who survive, compromise our
operational methods, but algo, mako ie & prime target for the Cuban intelligonoe
servlce,
None of the above ghould be oonstrued as a waiver of my rights, O those of
my heirs, to take legel action to prevent the releage of my name andlor to oollect
damages, both civil and puitive, resulting fom the release of my name. There
exlets en implioit contraot between Ine and the Agency dating fom when I accepted
the inconvaniences of @ clandestine retirement; Tho Agency Undertook to provide &
LASTNNG cover for me. It ghould ba that this impliclt contraot predetes
Public Lew 102-526 by some 18 years. Naturally, I am going to infor my legal
advisor of this entire matter, I suggest that you together a set of ell documents
pertaining t0 my retirement; 80 that:these can be mado available for hia review:
[refrain fom comment about e U,S, Congregs that would pass Buch e bil,
and 9
President who would fail to veto it. (You of course, are not te-blame:) The
Now York Times and the Waghington Post; will, of courso, be drooling to got their
haods On your papers. I dont envy you because this i9 an extremely cmplicated
metter; Unfortunately, the release on a lot of non-pertinent informatlon will g0
8
wey to reveel the soope and role of the Agenoy in Latin Amerlca to any analyst
who wents to review the material and pieoe it together, Ibelieve that this role ia not
significantly different today than it was when President Kennedy wes murdered.
Only the targets and the gadgets have changed;
Sincerely yours,
Thomas J, Floreg
P,st.14/14
notod
pull
Iong -