Transcript of 104-10102-10227.pdf
==================================================
Page 1
==================================================
104-10102-10227 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F_ KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992
7AE
14 February 1977
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT : Tadeus z (Tad) Witold SZULC (AMEAPE-1 (201-50539)
1. SZULC was born on 25 July 1926 in Warsaw, Poland _
He arrived in Brazil from Lisbon on 3 August 1940 , and came
to the U.S. in October 1947 under sponsorship of U.S _ Ambassador
John C. WILEY , the husband of his mother' s sister _ He became
a
correspondent for the New York Times (NYT) in 1953 , and
became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1954 by a
special
Congressional bi11.
2 _ SZULC has been under suspicion
as a
hostile foreign
agent since 1948 when the FBI reported (apparently from a
@ritish]source) that he was a Comunist. He brought himself
to the attention of CIA in August 1959 in Santiago, Chile by
claiming (falsely) to be "cleared" and requesting contact with
an Agency representative . This was the first of many such
incidents in Latin America; and resulted in a warning to a11
Latin American Stations to beware of SZULC and his efforts to
interview Agency personnel. It also resulted in continuing
watch of his movements and activities because represented
a threat to the cover of Agency personnel . By 1960 his reputa-
tion was so widespread that several different CIA officers
called for an investigation that would clear wp "once and for
a11" his suspected connections with a
hostile intelligence
service He was in frequent contact with Communist Party
leaders and functionaries throughout Latin America, constantly
sought out and elicited information from U,5 , Embassy officers ,
TturMecn
Uee Only
DNot "
Fvz
they
nckground
Reproduo)
?be
==================================================
Page 2
==================================================
SERHET
frequently mentioning the name of other CIA officers with
whom he was acquainted.
3 _ Although the suspicions have increased , and SZULC ' s
anti-Agency activities have become much more serious and
blatant in the 1970' $ , it has not been possible to clear up
any of the suspicions about his motives or his possible
connections with a foreign intelligence service . There have
been numerous reviews of his files and the; interest in his
activities has extended from the case officer. level to the DCI .
In fact, it is not possible to come to any clear conclusion
about this man, and the notes below are simply illustrative
of the kinds of things that the suspicions alive _ It
is important to note that SZULC ' s activities can be explained
by the combination of his personality , ambition, and the
demands on an investigative reporter for the NYT _ He: is an
aggressive , insensitive, and persistent journalist with the
family connections (Ambassador Wiley) and ability to develop
the kinds of contacts appropriate to a successful correspondent
for a paper like the NYT
4 Nevertheless , there are elements throughout his
entire career that are elmost designed to arouse suspicion _
For example , a
British] source in Rio de Janeiro (see Attachment A)
reported that SZULC was "directed" by the Polish regime in
Warsaw to seek employment in U,S. journalistic circles_ This
report runs like a thread throughout his file and 1s repeated
and garbled in several versions over the years . The report
2
HsR
keep
==================================================
Page 3
==================================================
SEGRET
has never been
explained and was apparently never
15
reported in full to [Condon] by the [British]representative in
Rio . This report and other questions that arose early in his
career (his contacts with a cous in who was a Press Attache in
the Polish Embassy in Rio) were, however, just the earliest
elements that eroused suspicion.
5_ Because he became s0 well-known to so many Agency
officers , his name and reputation have become subject of
discussion on many occasions One senior operations officer
stated in 1975 that a Soviet agent could not be more beneficial
to the Soviets and the Communist cause than SZULC has been _
Although he presented a generally anti-Communist view prior
to qutting the NYT in 1972 , it is noteworthy that he arranged
extensive, favorable TV coverage of the Communist-dominated
Ligas Campesinas in Northeast Brazil and that one of the most
important anti-Castro operations AMTRUNK in which he was
involved from the beginning , was disastrous for al1 participants _
More indicative of his true beliefs , however, are the articles
he has written since Watergate _ have become increasingly
critical of the CIA and of the USG generally and have damaged
U.S, image and prestige _
6 The notes below are somewhat random examples of
elements in SZULC ' s file that bring him under suspicion _ As
mentioned above , in no way
point to a firm conclusion_
For further information on
SZULC during the period 1963 1964 ,
see the CI review prepared at Miami Station on Jorge VOLSKY
in 1964 .
2/8k
adequately
They
they
b20
==================================================
Page 4
==================================================
JEBRET
a J The 1948 FBI report that SZULC was involved in
supplying the Polish Legation in Rio with information
from his personal contacts and from Ambassador John C ,
Wiley has been repeated in various versions throughout
SZULC ' s file. The FBI has found similar allegations
made by other sources who knew SZULC at that time_ In
addition, 'several sources have mentioned SZULC ' s relations
with his cousin, Ignacy SACHS who was the Press Attache
in the Polish Embassy in 1947 and 1948, although there
is no indication that SACHS had intelligence connections _
b , SZULC ' $ marriage to the daughter of the American
manager of the English language newspaper in Rio de Janeiro,
the Herald, lasted only until SZULC had permanent residence
in the U.S. and appears to have been carried through for
that purpose .
C 1949 (SZULC was only 23) he had come to the
16~Z0
attention of thelRio Station]because of his dealings'
with the Polish Legation and because investigation revealed
his father had some (apparently innocent) business dealings
with Russians visiting Brazil from Mexico _
d_ In 1954 , about a year after he was hired by the
NYT , SZULC obtained a sensational story , by telephone
)
from a Communist leader in Guatemala _ This launched his
career with the NYT _
In 1956 SZULC was investigating Brazilian nuclear
policy for the NYT _ Although a legitimate topic , it was
somewhat unusual for him and the timing
seems unusual
for NYT interest.
:ESnET
VG
By
4
==================================================
Page 5
==================================================
SECRET
f_ In 1959 , on a trip to Santiago , Chile, SZULC
claimed to be "cleared" and requested an interview
with an Agency representative. This was the first of
numerous such requests. In addition, it was in about
1959 that he: also began making
a
point of telling Agency
personnel the names of other . Agency officers he had
identified.
g - An article SZULC wrote on Cuba for the NYT in
December 1959 was hailed
as an antidote to the excessively
favorable reports of his colleague , Herbert MATTHEWS _ but
in fact his article was largely favorable to Fidel CASTRO
and to CASTRO ' s plans for Cuba _ It is only in comparison
that
with_MATTHEWS blatantly pro-CASTRO articles SZULC S
piece/ can
be considered balanced _
h By September 1960 , SZULC was in the forefront of
those advocating action against CASTRO _ (It was he who
finally brought the Leonardo Plan to Washington in 1963 ,.
See AMTRUNK Operational paper) _
i In April 1961, shortly after John F KENNEDY was
innaugurated, SZULC was transferred to Washington by the
NYT . Although a reasonable transfer, it is noteworthy
that in a very short time SZULC claimed that he had a
standing invitation
to g0 directly to the President, the
Vice
President , the Attorney General , McGeorge BUNDY
and Robert HURWITCH on Cuben matters _
5
SENBET
==================================================
Page 6
==================================================
QOQ
SECRET
j SZULC persistently sought a continuing contact
with an Agency representative in Washington shortly after
he arrived until it was granted in December 1962 . The
first contact was with Albert C. DAVIES (Lt. Col. on
militery detail to CIA Cuba) and was arranged at the
behest of Colonel GROGAN , the Assistant to the Director,
on SZULC ' s request_
ka In early 1963 , at President KENNEDY S urging ,
contact with SZULC was made into a formal relationship and
was continued until October 1964 . The meetings were used
by SZULC to cross check his information from other sources ,
including various Cuban exiles and the Department of
State. He became, by virtue of his contacts with the
exile community and throughout' Washington,
one of the most
knowledgeable people in the area of Cuban affairs, anti-
CASTRO activities, and U.S _ Government policy. (See CI
study on Jorge VOLSKY for more information on this period.)
1 The Agency officer , Alfonso RODRIGUEZ who main-
tained official contact with SZULC in 1963 and 1964 said
in July 1964:
"The. special friendship and
mutual admiration
society that has existed between Tad SZULC , Jorge
VOLSKY and Manuel RAY and the JURE is not something
that is transparent or easily explained , This
alliance 'may be something unholy and Machiavellian;
I just' do not know _
)
but I can find no evidence to
prove it. I1
6f
S21
==================================================
Page 7
==================================================
Qoooo
SERHET
m _ Another officer, Seymour Young, wrote in 1965 :
"After reading and re-reading this man ' s various
files , I began to feel that this man in his position
would be an ideal 'agent of influence' It was
noted that he is always in a crisis area and usually
in advance of the crisis and writes articles which
are more concerned with the Comunist successes. M
n _ In about' August 1965, SZULC was sent to Madrid
as the NYT representative for Spain and Portugal- He
stayed overseas until December 1968 . He was present in
Prague during the Soviet invasion of August 1968 and in
December he was expelled, apparently for being too
inquisitive _ However , the WWest German Service Ihas rema ined
suspicious of the circus tances of SZULC ' $ expulsion and
the details have never been clarified_ (It is interesting
that SZULC wrote articles reflecting the official CZECH
line concerning, the defection of General Jan SEJNA who
was in the Czech Intelligence service.)
SZULC was reported by an FBI source to have gone
horseback riding With Boris
V . YAROCHEVSKIY_ a suspect
KGB officer , in Washington in June or
July 1971 . SZULC ' s
file reflects no regular contact with Bloc diplomats .
P. In 1972 and 1973 SZULC covered Watergate extensively
and demonstrated
an extreme bias against the CIA_
July 1972 , SZULC' s inquiries of the Department of State
and his articles had taken on a distinctly anti-US Govern-
ment tone _ His coverage of guerrilla and terrorist groups
SeGhet
I(6k
By
==================================================
Page 8
==================================================
Qoooo
SECRET
was less sure than in earlier `days and was frequently
sensationalist and full of inaccuracies , (See, especially ,
article in NYT for 14 July 1972 on a tertorist Headquarters
in Zurich and other wild statements .)
9 - Since 1974 SZULC ' s articles have been highly
criticel of the Agency and he has used the background
information he gathered in the 1960 ' s to attack the Agency
and to criticize its operations _
r In May 1975 SZULC accused the Agency of rifling
the files of U,S, Senators This was only one of
irresponsible and false articles he wrote trying to dis -
credit the Agency . One of the more spectacular efforts
was a series in Esquire magazine , in which, among other
things, he charged that the U.S. intelligence community
had a hidden budget of $25 billion dollars and a network
of 200,000 spies _
S _
Inside the Company: 4 CIA Diary, Philip AGEE
credits SZULC ' s daughter, Nicole, for having "obtained
vital research materials in New York and Washington,
D,C,"
There is reason to believe, particularly in view of the
extreme views Tad SZULC has manifested in the past two
years , that he may have aided his daughter in her "research, Ii
SUMMATION
The . case against Tad SZULC as a
foreign agent
is weak.
However , his most recent activities are entirely consonant with
the view that he has already served the Soviets well and can
8
SCrET
many
In,
==================================================
Page 9
==================================================
Qoooo
SECRET
end his career as an overt propagandist taking advantage
of
the current furor over the CIA to do the greatest possible"
damage _ The curtent paralysis of a11 anti-Communist action by
>
the Agency attests to the effectiveness of AGEE , SZULC , the
Soviets, et a1 -
B
NOTE : (See attachment/ from a highly sensitive source_
use of the SECRET /SENSITIVE attachment requires C/CI
approval,) The source reported that Nicole, while working
with the DGI in Cuba to. Gxpose the Agency , said that except for
her father , her whole family
were "fascists _ Mi She said that
her father quit the NYT because of the restrictive editorial
policy and he wished to write according to his beliefs _
03
LAD/ JFK Tas Force 1977Marty Millez;rp
2 Attachments , a/ s
ffled : 201-50539
secdei
l/6
Any
Copy